A.V. Club Blog

Great directors take great risks, and it’s only natural that at any festival,

a few are bound to fall flat on their face. Last year, for example, Claire Denis

followed up the sterling trifeca of Beau Travail, Trouble Every Day,

and Friday Night with L’Intrus, a film so confounding

that she took it home for drastic re-edits and it still hasn’t resurfaced

in the states. Then Lucas Moodysson, once the gentle humanist of Show Me Love

and Together fame, went off the deep end with the extreme miserablism

of A Hole In My Heart. But in just two days, four of the nine films I’ve

seen are either the worst in their director’s career or somewhere near the

bottom, making it perhaps the most disappointing streak in the six years I’ve

been going to Toronto. (A critic friend of mine—who, admittedly, got a lot

of big tickets out of the way by going to Cannes and Sundance earlier this year—has

liked only one of the 20 films he’s seen.)

To get the happy news out of the way first, David Cronenberg isn’t one of

those unfortunate fuck-ups. I’m reluctant to write anything at all specific

about A

History Of Violence, because the film’s biggest surprises—indeed,

its only surprises—occur during the first half. I’d recommend that

everyone see this film before exposing themselves to trailers or reviews, which

can’t help but to give away revelations that are key to the movie’s

considerable impact. Cronenberg often likes to take his films down bizarre and

psychologically knotty tributaries, but with A History Of Violence, he’s

made his most conventional work to date, a thriller that marches directly and

purposefully toward a chilling conclusion. In fact, it may be a little too straightforward

for its own good: At a certain point, the film just goes exactly where you expect

it to go. But it’s the how that makes all the difference here…

And now on to the letdowns, starting with Terry Gilliam’s Tideland,

a project charged with the full force of his creative vision, which isn’t

entirely a good thing. After the compromised Brothers Grimm, it’s

good to see Gilliam this wholly invested in a film, but he doesn’t know

when to pull back on the throttle and allow the audience to get its footing. His

hero is an imaginative and resourceful little girl who’s left to her own

devices when her junkie parents die one after the other, leaving her in a dilapidated

home in the middle of nowhere. She represses these and other horrors by escaping

into a fantasy world where he closest confidants are the severed Barbie heads

that she wags on her fingers like puppets. And she’s by far the most well-adjusted

character in the film! Tideland is undoubtedly a work of integrity: As

Noel writes, there’s bound to be some people out there who will consider

it a masterpiece. (Though I haven’t met any of them yet.) For me and many

others, it was relentlessly unpleasant, something to be endured more than appreciated.

Disappointments are more common in the rollercoaster career of Abel Ferrara, whose

maverick sensibility has yielded great highs (Ms. 45, Bad Lieutenant,

King Of New York, Body Snatchers) and embarrassing lows (New

Rose Hotel, The Blackout, and Dangerous Game, though all

have their defenders). A response of sorts to The Passion Of The Christ—or

at least a deepening of the religious dialogue—Mary

revives the heavy Catholic themes that occasionally surface in Ferrara’s

work, but it never comes close to cohering. The film’s premise, about the

hubbub surrounding the release of a movie about Mary, has all kinds of potential,

but Ferrara keeps too many balls in the air: The star (Juliette Binoche) gets

so deeply into the role that she disappears to Jerusalem for a year, the host

(Forest Whitaker) of a Charlie Rose-like roundtable show faces a crisis of faith

that causes him to renew his own lapsed relationship with God, and the film’s

temperamental director (Matthew Modine) gets embroiled in protests and controversy.

With his spot-on Ferrara impersonation, Modine kicks things to life whenever he

appears on screen, but much of the movie is given over to Whitaker’s character,

whose personal journey is handled with a heavy hand.

The day ended with Seven

Swords, a martial arts epic from Tsui Hark, who’s proved

his meddle in the past with the Once Upon A Time In China and Zu:

Warriors Of The Magic Mountain, but loses his way here. The story isn’t

terribly complicated: Emperor bans martial arts and offers a cash bounty for the

heads of those who practice it. Bad guys use this decree to lop the heads off

of villagers indiscriminately. Seven good guys with special swords fight the bad

guys. Sounds simple, right? Then why was my head swimming for all two-and-a-half

tedious hours of it? Even the action sequences are oddly clipped and unsatisfying,

leaving only the handsome production values to admire.

Day Four

For press and public screenings both, festival programmers normally do an excellent

job of anticipating the degree of interest in a given film and scheduling it accordingly,

but sometimes they make curious decisions. Michael Haneke’s new movie Hidden

was widely considered one of the highlights of Cannes and it has two relatively

big stars in Daniel Auteuil and Juliette Binoche, but it was screened for press

this morning in a theater that could only house 160 people, which left about twice

that number (including myself) out in the cold.

Happily, I was able to score a ticket to Monday’s public screening, but

the shut-out meant that I had to improvise my first festival slot-filler in The

Quiet, a self-serious drama about incest, suburban angst, and

other indie-movie favorites. I hated the director Jamie Babbitt’s last film,

the self-consciously outrageous camp comedy But I’m A Cheerleader,

but only a few lines of quirky high-school dialogue in The Quiet suggest

the same sensibility at work. Where Cheerleader was candy-colored and

manic, Babbitt’s new film is studied and more than a little awkward. When

a dysfunctional family brings their sullen, deaf teenage relative into the household,

dark secrets come to light, mainly that daddy (Martin Donovan) is sleeping with

his hot daughter (Elisha Cuthbert) while his wife (Edie Falco) is passed out on

valium. What follows neither shocks nor disturbs nor surprises.

Missing the early screening of Hidden actually solved my biggest scheduling

conflict, allowing me to catch Hou Hsiao-hsien’s Three

Times, a trio of novella-length movies that plays like a K-Tel

collection of his previous work. Set in three different time periods—the

60s, the 10s, and present-day, respectively—the film couple the same two

actors in each segment, but they all have their individual distinctions. Opinions

vary widely on which of the three is the most accomplished, but I much preferred

the first one, a sweetly nostalgic piece about the relationship between a pool-hall

girl and a heartbreaker about to enter the service. Optimism is a rare and precious

thing in a Hou movie, and with its great use of pop songs (“Smoke Gets In

Your Eyes” and “Rain And Tears”), gorgeous color cinematography,

and unabashed romanticism, the segment bears more than a little resemblance to

Wong Kar-wai. The other two are basically more concise (and less affecting) versions

of previous Hou films: The second, a silent movie about a concubine and her master,

recycles the suffocated beauty of Flowers Of Shanghai to lesser effect

while the third echoes the modern-day ennui of Hou’s last feature, Millennium

Mambo. Overall, a good sampling of his work, especially for newcomers, but

the last two segments find Hou spinning his wheels a bit.

Seems like nobody else cared much for Duelist,

the latest from Lee Myung-se, a Korean action maestro whose last feature, the

1999 cop shoot-‘em-up Nowhere To Hide, took an avant-garde approach

to the genre that made a deep impression on me. Substance takes a backseat to

style, but oh what style! More so than even wire-fu epics like Hero,

Lee’s films completely disregard the conventions of action choreography

and push the fight scenes to something like abstract art. With altering film speeds,

stuttering freeze frames, and striking bursts of color, Nowhere To Hide

and Duelist have the graphic intensity of a comic book. Duelist

may be silly and over-the-top, but there are sequences—particularly, a sword

battle in a moonlit alleyway that plays like an erotically charged ballet—that

are miraculous in their image-making. Judging by the tepid critical response,

the flood of early walkouts by buyers hoping for the next Crouching Tiger,

and Nowhere To Hide’s commercial wipeout, I worry that the film

might not find a home in the state. Maybe Tartan Films, which has been championing

Korean auteurs like Park Chan-wook (Oldboy) and Kim Ki-duk (Bad Guy),

will take a chance. Otherwise, Asian action nuts will have to look for the import

DVD.

After the sugar rush of Duelist, a comedown was inevitable, but I never

could have predicted how far the day would crash. With Human Resources

and especially Time Out, French director Laurent Cantet proved himself

to be an incisive chronicler of the workaday world; his leftist leanings were

apparent in both, but they’re smuggled through characters and situations

that are subtly articulated. The program description on Cantet’s Vers

Le Sud (Heading South) raised some red flags pre-festival, but

if anyone could steer the premise of American spinsters and their Haitian boy-toys

away from didacticism, he’d be the guy to do it. Sadly, this is the movie

we’d feared, a ham-handed allegory about the ruinous effects of cultural

imperialism in the Caribbean. Lost in the blather is a wonderfully imperious Charlotte

Rampling, who plays the Queen Bee of a beachside resort where middle-aged women

treat lithe Haitian studs like a form of rejuvenating skin cream. To make matters

worse, the film has the most cringe-inducing explanation of the title since The

Upside Of Anger.

Early word on Takeshis’,

a hall-of-mirrors lark from the generally reliable Takeshi Kitano (Fireworks,

Sonatine), was that it was for Kitano fanboys only: The more you like

him, the more you’ll like the movie. I’ve seen and enjoyed Kitanos

of every stripe, whether they’re violent, lyrical, sentimental, quirky,

or all of the above. But I still found Takeshis’ an indulgent,

repetitive, and ultimately unbearable riff on his own fame and persona. Only recommended

for Kitano fans who also think F For Fake is Orson Welles’ best

film. And that's a pretty narrow audience indeed.

Coming soon: A report on a miraculously good Day Five, in which the festival regains

a lot of lost momentum.