C+

Blindness

C+

Blindness

Director: Fernando Meirelles
Cast: Michael Mahonen

Community Grade (11 Users)

  • A
  • A-
  • B+
  • B
  • B-
  • C+
  • C
  • C-
  • D+
  • D
  • D-
  • F

Your Grade

?

The phrase "style over substance" generally denotes empty flash, but it takes on a slightly different meaning in Blindness, an adaptation of Jóse Saramago's acclaimed allegorical novel about a mass epidemic of sightlessness. Here, style and substance are both ample. They're just at odds with one another, as director Fernando Meirelles piles on a host of visual gimmicks, no doubt intending to suggest the intense disorientation of those newly inflected with "white blindness." But the effect of his aggressive language—the extremely shallow focus, the heavenly whites and blurry blacks, the jagged editorial ellipses—are a major distraction from what might have been a timely and politically loaded tale of society on the brink. There's a good movie here, but we get it in pieces that are sometimes hard to decipher.

The opening scenes neatly capture the spread of the mysterious disease: In a traffic jam in an unnamed city, a man suddenly loses his sight. A good Samaritan helps escort him home, but then he goes blind, too. As does the man's wife and then his optometrist, played by Mark Ruffalo, and also some of the patients in his waiting room. Faced with this extraordinary outbreak, the government rounds up the first wave of victims and puts them in quarantine in an abandoned hospital. Among the inmates is Ruffalo's wife Julianne Moore, who hides the fact that she can see in order to stay close to her husband. With the unaffected naturally keeping their distance and guards with itchy trigger-fingers penning them in, the blind are left leading the blind, and the situation rapidly deteriorates into a Lord Of The Flies-like scenario.

In order for Blindness to work, this big unraveling needs to be revealed with inexorable logic, as a mini-society of ordinary, decent people are broken down into savages—violent, lusty, and territorial. And that's where Meirelles' distracting flourishes do the most damage, because it's never clear enough how one step down the ladder leads naturally to another. It's questionable whether Meirelles even needed to illustrate "white blindness" visually—though a similar ploy worked for The Diving Bell And The Butterfly—but the style acts like a screen between the audience and the movie that's difficult to circumvent. In that sense, maybe Meirelles gets the blind person's experience right after all.

Filed Under: Film

More Movie Review