Theo James dubs self too old to play James Bond

The Gentlemen star is one year younger than Daniel Craig was when Casino Royale premiered.

Theo James dubs self too old to play James Bond

The hunt for the new James Bond has been going on for so long that you’d be forgiven for thinking that the series’ producers are waiting for some actor to age into the role. Pre-Amazon Bond producer Michael G. Wilson said years ago that the actor who would eventually take the role would be a “thirty-something,” which officially put Tom Holland in the running as of early June. (Of course, he’s probably too associated with Spider-Man to take on the role, but allow us to make the point.) But the length of this process has potentially bumped some people out of the process, like Theo James, who’s 41. Even James thinks so. 

“I’m definitely too old now, for one,” the White Lotus and The Gentlemen star says in a new profile in British GQ. This, of course, isn’t really true, and writer Xuanlin Tham says so. For example, Daniel Craig was 42 when Casino Royale premiered, as was Pierce Brosnan when Golden Eye opened. 

But you also get the sense from reading the profile that this is more of a polite excuse than a real rationale. He says playing Bond “would be an example of a place you could never come back from.” This comes after an extended conversation about James’ experience in YA adaptation Divergent, which led to him and his father running from fans in the streets of Spain and which is still causing people to interrupt him to ask for selfies during his GQ interview. He rarely mentions Divergent by name, but negatively describes one job where he felt like “an avatar for IP.” In that case, he probably wouldn’t be thrilled to be Bond, especially in the franchise’s Amazon era

 
Join the discussion...
Keep scrolling for more great stories.