An actual botanist attempts to settle the debate around Baby Groot's parentage
[The following contains major spoilers for Avengers: Infinity War and the Guardians Of The Galaxy films.]
Guardians of the Galaxy’s Groot is a sentient tree only capable of uttering the words, “I am Groot,” the irony being that Groot is actually so much more. Recently, we wrote about the heartrending reality behind his final words to cohort Rocket Raccoon. As director James Gunn explained, just before dying, he said, “Dad.” This was nearly as sad as Gunn’s revelation that Groot’s sacrifice at the end of the first Guardians was final, and that the sequel’s Baby Groot was not a resurrection, but rather a son with no memory of his father.
As a matter of argument, some fans have pointed out that Groot’s consciousness carries through his cuttings, thus puncturing Gunn’s vision of the character. Well, now an honest-to-god botanist has entered the conversation to further complicate things.
Over a series of tweets, botanist James Wong breaks down the biology of Groot, using science to answer the question of just how much of the original Groot lives on in his offspring.