The Jellicle Ball rescues Cats
The new Broadway revival rehabilitates the image of a musical that's long been a pop culture punchline.
Photo by Matthew Murphy and Evan Zimmerman for MurphyMade
Even before the 2019 film, the musical Cats was already a pop culture punchline. Whether people considered it a good show or not, it was inarguably kind of silly, a huge commercial hit that few would call the pinnacle of theater as art. In a clip from a 2004 PBS documentary that goes somewhat viral every so often, Broadway director Hal Prince recalled hearing about the show for the first time and searching for some subtext. “Is this about Queen Victoria? She’s the main cat? And then Disraeli and Gladstone are other cats? And then there are poor cats? Am I missing this?” Composer Andrew Lloyd Webber paused and said: “Hal, it’s about cats.”
Cats, at least originally, was literally just about cats. The plot of Cats is so scant that it’s almost irrelevant. We meet a number of cats, they tell us their deals, and one of them will be selected to ascend to the Heaviside Layer to be reincarnated. For nearly a decade, it was the longest-running musical in Broadway history. Part of the reason for its success was how simple and literal it was; a tourist visiting New York could come from anywhere in the world, have any level of knowledge of the English language, and probably have a decent enough time. But the lack of depth also made it easy to mock, whether lovingly or otherwise. Tom Hooper’s equally literal, very serious film adaptation didn’t do the material any favors, either. Asking the audience to suspend disbelief in a Broadway theater is reasonable; in the uncanny valley, less so. That adaptation sucked any fun out of the show, making singing and dancing felines boring as soon as the initial shock to the senses wears off.