Challengers review: Zendaya, Josh O'Connor, and Mike Faist get entangled in a sexy love triangle
The three stars bring playful energy to director Luca Guadagnino's tennis romp

Tennis is notoriously not a sport that lends itself well to the medium of film. The tension in this game is all about the silent moments between points, and continuously hitting a small ball with a racquet doesn’t make for exciting entertainment. But director Luca Guadagnino and screenwriter Justin Kuritzkes have found a fascinating entry point: a tumultuous love triangle in which tennis is incidental to the story. Challengers, seemingly about three tennis players, is actually about three characters who play love like a tennis match, to get ahead and reap the rewards they want.
The framework of the film is an important match in the careers of Patrick (Josh O’Connor) and Art (Mike Faist), rivals and former best friends. Between them is Tashi (Zendaya), former girlfriend of one and current wife and coach of the other. In flashbacks, the audience gets to know how they met 13 years ago and how their lives became intricately intertwined with each other. Guadagnino has always been attuned to capturing the fiery emotional undercurrents of relationships, as he proved in movies like I Am Love and Call Me By Your Name. For many of his characters, desire is their raison d’etre and the driving force of their narrative arc. In Kuritzkes’ screenplay desire is a weapon daringly, and sometimes manipulatively, used by the three protagonists. Seems like a perfect alignment of talent.
For the most part that is true. Kuritzkes’ screenplay is full of many instances where dialogue recedes to the background and the characters converse in looks and subtext. Guadagnino frames his three actors in many close-ups and medium shots where their eyes and the way they ogle each other tell the story. In return, Sayombhu Mukdeeprom’s camera ogles the actors’ bodies, capturing every flicker of light in their eyes, every trembling lip and sweaty brow. All of this makes for a movie high on sexual heat, something not seen much in contemporary American cinema.
To imitate the constant back and forth of tennis, the script relies on verbal callbacks. A character will mention a throwaway phrase foreshadowing a situation, and later on, that same phrase is repeated by the same character. Only this time, it’s actually truthfully describing what happens. This veers close to a schematic writing clutch, but works nonetheless. It knowingly lets the audience in on the private jokes of the characters. Challengers is not a glamorous depiction of tennis; rather, it’s a movie about what happens behind the scenes in crowded locker rooms, smelly dorms, and anonymous antiseptic hotel bars and hallways.