Courtney Love being sued for her Twitter feed again

Love, naturally, responded by firing them, then allegedly returned several months later asking them to help her again. When the firm declined, Love took to her Twitter account to allege that they’d accepted a bribe, saying, “I was fucking devastated when Rhonda J Holmes Esq of San Diego was bought off”—in her mind, just another machination of the vast network she believes has conspired to steal everything from $470 million to Kurt Cobain’s ashes from her. And because everyone takes Courtney Love’s legal advice very seriously, Holmes claims that Love’s statements have caused “significant damage” to her career, and she would like to be paid now, please.

Of course, while her original Twitter defamation case has established some precedent, since that March settlement, Love has embarked on a media blitz in which she’s begun scattering defamatory comments to the vodka-soaked breeze—talking about pulling Kelly Osbourne out of drug comas and snorting coke out of Pamela Anderson’s ass, accusing Andy Dick and Winona Ryder of getting her addicted to Benzedrine, etc.—so it could be even more difficult for a prosecutor to establish a baseline in order to delineate statements that are intended to cause damage from Love’s everyday speech patterns. After all, do you sue the clouds for raining? Do you sue the flowers for blooming? Do you sue the sun for getting so wasted that it calls you an asshole and barfs on you?