Babette’s Feast
Anyone looking put themselves into a quick coma for some reason should consider sitting down and watching a lot of the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar winners from the ’80s and ’90s. Most of these films aren’t bad, by any means, but AMPAS tends to be drawn—even today, but especially back then—to blandly inspirational period pieces rather than to the truly vital work being done all over the world. Babette’s Feast, which won the award in 1988, exemplifies the kind of foreign film the Academy loves: tasteful, literary, unchallenging, faintly dull. Reviews at the time raved not about the film’s story, characters, themes, or visual style, but instead about how delectable its climactic, titular feast appeared; “Don’t go on an empty stomach!” was the common refrain. When a movie’s primary selling point applies equally well to photos in a cookbook, it’s best not to get too excited.
Faithfully adapted from a short story by Isak Dinesen—a story so short that it’s included in the Criterion edition’s accompanying booklet—Babette’s Feast tells the trifling tale of Babette (Stéphane Audran), a French housekeeper working in Denmark for two elderly spinsters (Bodil Kjer and Birgitte Federspiel) at the end of the 19th century. Both of her employers, it’s revealed in extended flashbacks, renounced worldly desires (love in one case, fame and fortune in the other) to serve the Lord in ascetic piety alongside their pastor father. When Babette wins 10,000 francs in the lottery one day, she asks her employers for permission to cook a real French meal in honor of the pastor’s centenary, to which they reluctantly agree. But since this entire small village believes that pleasure is inherently sinful, they collectively decide to consume the food in stony silence, as if it were no different from the bland gruel they usually eat. (To this non-believer, that makes as much sense as agreeing to commit adultery so long as both parties act totally bored, but skip it.)
On the page, where it unfolds concisely and elegantly, this works reasonably well. Translated to the screen, however, the story seems unduly quaint in its long, slow buildup and faintly ridiculous in its culmination. Babette’s culinary creations do indeed look scrumptious, but the effects they have on the guests are a purely literary conceit, especially since everybody’s vowed to remain emotionless. “They only knew that the rooms had been filled with a heavenly light,” writes Dinesen, “as if a number of small halos had blended into one glorious radiance. Taciturn old people received the gift of tongues; ears that for years had been almost deaf were opened to it. Time itself had merged into eternity.”