In a brutish hour of TV, Escape At Dannemora takes us back to the beginning
Until this penultimate episode, Escape At Dannemora has distinguished itself as a character-driven drama, more remarkable for its subtleties and for the ways it used its bigger, flashier moments—like, for instance, the titular escape—to illuminate certain truths about its characters (especially the truths they wouldn’t admit to themselves). Parsing through these subtleties and making the connections between the granular facts of these people’s personalities and their broader actions, has made the show such a pleasure to watch—even if its central trio are profoundly unpleasant people. “Chapter Six” is not a subtle episode. Not in its execution or in its central message—which only works when the episode is viewed in tandem with the entire storyline. Without context, there is no message, just a nauseating display of cruelty.
Of course, the show’s creative architects have withheld the stories of how, exactly, our terrible triad ended up at Clinton Correctional, because if we knew upfront what each of them had done, we’d feel too revolted to truly give a damn whether they broke out and made it to that beach in Mexico. The choice to reveal this information, and to reveal it now, after we’ve come to, if not empathize with these characters, then at least become invested in them, complicates our understanding of the narrative. The show jams its thumb square in the eye of one of the most troubling tropes around our contemporary zest for true crime stories—the impetus to portray the killer as a poor misbegotten soul or a compellingly cunning mastermind, a figure worthy of obsession and study. The true crime boon, filled with titles like “My Favorite Murder,” “Making A Murderer,” “The Last Podcast On The Left,” and “White Wine True Crime,” often regard the real violence done to real people with a hideous glibness—reducing the very worst moments of, or the excruciating ends to, human lives as popcorn fodder. This voyeuristic approach aligns us with the smirking killers.
“Chapter Six” is a direct refutation of this approach: It opens on the deputy who will become David Sweat’s victim and follows him through what is a typical shift, until he makes that fatefully wrong turn down the wrong corridor. Deputy Kevin Tarsia, played with a casual affability by Jim Parrack, is a good cop and a decent man: We see him let a rookie driver off with a warning and teasing admonition about learning the “lost art” of parallel parking; cleaning trash off the road; and, most poignantly, stopping home to drop off the ketchup and mustard for a cook-out he won’t get to attend, gently waking up his sleeping wife with a kiss (and a fond hope for a shift break quickie that ends with a “rain check” that will never come due).
His likability is like a rare and pleasant breeze over the stultifying desert of pettiness and brutality the other characters we’ve been following have lived in, likely for their whole lives. That likability makes him the tragic figure here. Sweat first appears as a lean silhouette loading boosted goods into the trunk of a car; as that silhouette approaches, squeezing the handgun’s trigger repeatedly, director Ben Stiller focuses his camera on Deputy Tarsia’s bullet-ripped body as it falls to the concrete. Then Sweat gets in his car and runs the officer down. We don’t see Sweat behind the wheel—indeed, he only emerges again to stare dumbly at the carnage he’s wrought and mutter, “sorry”—Stiller’s camera lingers on the broken man’s legs flailing under the front bumper.