The Paramount merger is officially a red vs. blue issue

Attorneys general from Iowa and Montana are going to the Supreme Court to try to stop the antitrust lawsuit seeking to block the Paramount-Warner Bros. merger.

The Paramount merger is officially a red vs. blue issue

For a while already, Paramount’s potential acquisition of Warner Bros. has felt like one of the battles in a never-ending cultural and political war, pitting the Trump-friendly company against those who would rather not see one family and company control a massive segment of the media business. But if it only felt this way yesterday, today’s update makes this explicit. Two Republican attorneys general—Iowa’s Brenna Bird and Austin Knudsen—have filed a motion with the Supreme Court seeking to stop the antitrust lawsuit brought by 12 states and spearheaded by California AG Rob Banta, according to Variety. The motion calls the antitrust lawsuit “a politicized enforcement action.” 

According to experts interviewed by Variety, the filing is unlikely to go anywhere; one law professor referred to it as “political grandstanding.” It’s not hard to see how someone would come to that conclusion. “This case is about the legal limits on politicized antitrust enforcement by a small handful of states seeking to enjoin a $110 billion merger that the United States, most American states, and competition regulators worldwide have cleared,” reads part of the 56-page filing. This comes shortly after Bird wrote an op-ed in—get this—the Daily Wire, which made the culture war and red state/blue state resentment elements explicit. “Just like California should keep its hands off America’s bacon, California needs to understand that it doesn’t get to decide what Americans can choose to watch or stream,” she wrote. It was only a matter of time before someone started pushing for a corporate monopoly to own the libs. 

 
Join the discussion...
Keep scrolling for more great stories.