The scariest movies don't care if you close your eyes
Did you hear that? Undertone beckons audiences into the isolating art of sound-forward horror.
Photo: Artificial Eye
Often, the memory that lingers in one’s mind of a horror film is a frightening image: the spraying blood from a slasher’s hacked-up victim; the ominous apparition in an elegant ghost picture; the monster at the center of a creature feature. Less sticky in recollection are the sounds accompanying such frightful visions: the squelching, the cracking of bones during an unnatural transformation, even the smothering experience of a particularly oppressive silence. Some horror films push that sound design further, pairing it with a profound sense of isolation by trapping characters, and viewers, alone with what they’re hearing, a particularly resonant concept in a world that has become further defined by solitary watching and listening. By weaponizing their aural experience, these movies create a sense of terror that persists even when the viewer looks away.
Writer-director Ian Tuason’s new film undertone has entirely sold itself as focusing on the auditory experience of horror, following the hosts of a paranormal podcast who begin investigating a series of unsettling recordings sent to them. In concept, undertone is a literalized extrapolation of this sensory idea, of how the sounds of the horror genre intensify in solitude—here’s an entire movie built on the fear of sitting alone and hearing something scary. But the film also extends a lineage of audio-based horror films that orient a story around the experience of hearing chilling things through broadcasts and recordings.
Tuason is following in the footsteps of his Canadian countryman Bruce McDonald, whose 2008 film Pontypool plays out a George Romero-esque zombie-apocalypse doomsday from the isolated chambers of a local radio station. Shock-jock host Grant Mazzy (Stephen McHattie) and his crew realize something is terribly wrong in their modest hamlet when they begin receiving disturbing reports, live on-air, of vicious riots and cannibalistic behavior. The ghouls begin to populate the frame later in the runtime, but the extended buildup of tension is strictly due to the distressing audio of callers reporting from town, and the fact that our crew is insulated from whatever is going on right outside. The half-dozen people who make up Pontypool‘s credited sound department emphasize the fuzzy crackle of panicked voices transmitted across the airwaves, letting characters’ and viewers’ imaginations fill the gap between what can be seen and what is described. You internalize these audio passages in all their intensity within the space of your own mind, trapping you within your own idea of fear.
A decade later, director and co-writer Andrew Patterson indulged in his own radio-based mystery-thriller with The Vast Of Night, about a young switchboard operator and disc jockey who potentially discover an alien broadcast frequency. Pontypool and The Vast Of Night each use radio stations to create a boundary, a conceptual constraint that turns their modest budgets into an advantage and lets the audience co-author elements of the horror in their heads, thus custom-tailoring the fear. Patterson pulls off impressive visual feats in his film, but it’s the ambition of the extended on-air monologues and auditory cues which plant imagery in the viewer’s brain and make The Vast Of Night unforgettable.