Mt. Everest is too staggering to recreate, it can only be documented

The world's tallest peak just works best when we really get to see it.

Mt. Everest is too staggering to recreate, it can only be documented

When asked why he wanted to climb Mount Everest, George Mallory famously said “Because it’s there.” With this quip, Mallory captured the innate allure of Everest. He was also unwittingly describing a problem for filmmakers. Everest, the tallest mountain in the world, really is there, and while Mallory died during his 1924 attempt to summit it, many people have made it to the top in the century since. Hundreds have died, just like him, while trying. There’s so much incredible majesty, and the high stakes that come with it, that Hollywood can’t really compete with Everest’s awesome reality. Documentaries, however, can. 

Two films out this October make the difference between fiction and nonfiction films about Everest very clear. The first, Tenzing, is a biopic about Tenzing Norgay, the Sherpa who in 1953 became the first person to summit the mountain alongside mountaineer Edmund Hillary. The second, Everest: The Other Side, is a documentary about mountaineer Jim Morrison’s mission to summit the mountain’s seldom-climbed North Face and ski back down despite—or perhaps because of—the many tragic losses he’s endured. (There’s a third mountaineering film this month, Apple’s documentary The Last First: Winter K2, but it’s about the world’s second-highest mountain rather than Everest.)

Tenzing, which stars Tibetan actor Genden Phuntsok as the title character supported by Tom Hiddleston’s Hillary and Willem Dafoe as the leader of the British expedition, is perfectly serviceable. By centering Tenzing, who frequently has been portrayed as a sidekick to the white climbers, the film is a worthwhile historical corrective. While the stars weren’t actually 8,000 meters up the face of Everest during filming, the movie filmed in Nepal and does boast some gorgeous footage of the real Everest and the surrounding Himalayas. Some of the most impressive, effective parts of Tenzing are the establishing shots where Everest dwarfs the actors in the foreground. This sense of awe does not always extend to the narrative. As the movie flashes back to Tenzing’s upbringing, romance with his late wife, and struggles to become a full, respected member of the climbing team, the uniqueness of Earth’s tallest mountain gets buried under familiar biopic beats, with some sports-movie tropes thrown in there, too. 

Other narrative Everest movies, of which there are surprisingly few, have the same issue. Obviously Ice Road: Vengeance, a sequel to the Liam Neeson-led Netflix actioner, isn’t striving for grandeur. The Climb, a biopic of French-Algerian Nadir Dendoune, who summited Everest with no mountaineering experience in 2008, is charming but goofy. Everest, the 2015 movie about the 1996 Mount Everest disaster famously documented in John Krakauer’s Into Thin Air, is probably the best-known movie about the mountain and one of the ones trying to convey its impact. An all-star cast whose ranks include Jake Gyllenhaal, Josh Brolin, Robin Wright, Jason Clarke, and Keira Knightley is somewhat wasted as Everest tries to recreate the harrowing thrills of a real-life tragedy. At times, Everest is effective. The jagged peaks and bottomless crevasses are intense, the frozen limbs gross, and a sequence where a dying Rob Hall (Clarke) says goodbye to his pregnant wife (Knightley) via satellite phone is genuinely affecting. 

And yet mountaineering fans saw all this before—in a movie also titled Everest, no less. The 1998 IMAX documentary was filmed during the same climbing season as the ’96 disaster, and the climbers in the documentary were involved in the rescue of some of the survivors and helped facilitate Hall’s final phone call. These moments are not dramatized the way they are in the movie; we don’t have audio of that call nor are there A-list actors recreating it. Rather than be to the documentary’s detriment, it exposes the fundamental issue holding back Everest movies: recreation. Even though the movie is based on a true story, it’s hard not to notice what’s fake. Is that really the mountain, or a special effect? Did that specific conversation or near-death experience actually happen, or was that invented for dramatic effect? Does this narrative seem a little too neat?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1khEBbx1xbU

To some extent, all movies based on true stories, especially stories that have already been the subject of a documentary, deal with this issue. But it is especially pronounced with films about Mount Everest, because the mountain isn’t just visually stunning, but holds a special place in the audience’s imagination. There is truly nowhere else in the world like it. That such a place actually exists is inherently more fascinating than any fictionalization or recreation could ever be. That’s why the most successful narrative film about Mount Everest works because it’s not trying to convince anyone that its Everest is real. The Summit Of The Gods, a 2021 French adaptation of a ’90s mountaineering manga, is a stunning adventure story with gorgeous animation that evokes the majesty of Everest without inviting comparisons with the truth. Instead, audiences escape into how the mountain must feel. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwDVv6pDBx8

Still, The Summit Of The Gods is an exception, and its animated characters are compelling but they’re not the actual people who are drawn to the mountain. Everest: The Other Side, is about some of those people. The footage documenting Morrison and his partner Hilaree Nelson’s efforts, and the mountains themselves, is breathtaking as you might expect. But The Other Side is even more profound as an exploration of loss, grief, and perseverance. There are deaths captured on camera and interview subjects break down in tears. The loss Morrison suffers in his life is hard to fathom, as are the challenges the mountain throws at him and his team. Also hard to believe is the devotion these people have to climbing despite what it’s cost them. It doesn’t make sense, but as The Other Side builds to its conclusion, it gradually, astoundingly justifies this drive. Everything in The Other Side is ethically fraught, but by the end you deeply understand both these people and the mountain they’re risking everything for. 

Tenzing tries to convey that same drive using all sorts of dramatic filmmaking tricks and familiar narrative beats. It only works to an extent. You do ultimately understand the character, but he remains just that: a character. Past the establishing shots, Tenzing‘s Mount Everest is a set. The story is a script. The truth of Everest is too staggering to recreate; it can only be witnessed. 

 
Join the discussion...
Keep scrolling for more great stories.