David Ellison threatens to move Paramount out of California if antitrust case goes to trial

The Paramount Skydance CEO thinks he can start the move by October 1, though he doesn't have another state in mind yet.

David Ellison threatens to move Paramount out of California if antitrust case goes to trial

As of now, Paramount is scheduled to go to trial over antitrust concerns in March. The company and its CEO David Ellison agreed to this last month, claiming that it would wait to close the merger so long as the trial happened before June 1, 2027. Technically speaking, Ellison isn’t reneging on that yet, though it sounds like he’s not totally willing to stand by it, either. According to a new report from Puck today, Ellison has begun telling investors that if California Attorney General Rob Bonta doesn’t agree to negotiate a settlement over the $110 billion transaction by October 1, he would begin moving the company out of the state. 

After October 1, Paramount will have to begin paying Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders a “ticking fee” of $7 million per day. The reasons for not wanting to do this are obvious; should the trial begin on March 2, as scheduled, Paramount would be on the hook for an extra $1.2 billion. Per Puck, Ellison suggested to shareholders that they would save $500 million in taxes per year by moving out of California and would make some money by selling the Paramount or Warner Bros. studio lots, though the company would still maintain a “creative hub” in California, where many of its vendors and talent are. The Paramount board is said to have already signed off on the move. 

There’s decent reason to think that Ellison might be bluffing here, though. For one thing, he’s known to just really like living in California, having already moved much of Paramount from New York to the Golden State last year when it was acquired by Skydance. For another, moving a company of this size (or even beginning to) in less than two months is no small undertaking and would probably trigger a decent amount of resignations, especially given that people inside the company are already anticipating layoffs should the merger go through. (Uprooting your whole life only to be laid off six months later is not an especially enticing offer to most people.) The move would certainly only turn more of the creative community against the move. What’s more, the company doesn’t yet know where they’d ultimately even go, with Texas, Georgia, and Tennessee, which have already made overtures to the company, said to be in the running. Still, there’s at least one reason Ellison could go through with it: If Bonta refuses to negotiate, Ellison doesn’t have many options left. 

 
Join the discussion...
Keep scrolling for more great stories.