Paddy
Genevieve Koski says "konnichiwa," and offers
this:
There are a bunch of theories as to the origin of
the V sign—either a peace sign or a Winston Churchill-style victory
symbol, depending on which story you go with—in Japanese culture, many of
which can be found on the Wikipedia
page on the subject. The most widely disseminated seems to be that
when U.S. figure skater Janet Lynn fell during the 1972 Winter Olympics in
Sapporo, she kept smiling and flashed the peace sign even while ass-down on the
ice, making her an overnight sensation in Japan. Copycats followed her lead.
There's a lot of pedantic reasoning floating
around rationalizing the sign's popularity in photographs—it allows
expressiveness in a notoriously reserved culture; it serves as a non-verbal
"cheese," indicating readiness to be photographed; and, most oddly, that it
draws attention away from the subjects' small eyes—but there seems to be
a general consensus on one thing: It's deeply ingrained in the culture. Japan
Today
asked young Japanese people why they make the V sign, and one
respondent said, "I make the peace sign but I don't know why I do it, who
invented it and when we started doing this. I think I've been doing it since I
was born. The peace sign gesture must have been programmed in my DNA, or
foreigners mind-controlled Japanese to make the peace sign subconsciously when
we pose for a photo to keep the peace after the war."
Mind control may be a bit of a stretch, but it's
worth noting that the sign is extremely present in anime/manga and commercial
television, no doubt aiding in its popularity among school kids. The symbol's
association with these have no doubt helped link it to the concept of "kawaii,"
or cuteness, a prominent aspect of modern Japanese pop culture and fashion
(think Hello Kitty, sailor uniforms, and pigtails) that, when taken to the
extreme, leads to situations like this:
Scriptology
When awards are given out to honor Best Screenplay
(Original/Adapted, etc.), are the judges reviewing actual scripts or finished
movies? As anyone who's read scripts after or before they go to filming knows,
they are usually quite different beasts, and take many different forms. (The
Coens' scripts read like stories, while P.T. Anderson's read like instruction
manuals… both are compelling.) But I'm sure there are lots of great scripts
that result in crap movies, and vice versa.
Rob
Benvie
Noel Murray peruses the rulebook:
It's
basically left up to the conscience of the individual, Rob. Some Academy Awards
categories require a nominating process that places select committees in
screening rooms, making (theoretically) informed decisions, but the screenplay
Oscars—like acting, directing, and the other major categories—are
nominated via a ballot that the entire voting membership of the Academy
receives. Those who are members of the Academy's writing branch are asked to
fill in their nominations for screenplay, the directors are asked to nominate
directors, and so on. (And everybody gets to nominate Best Picture candidates.)
But the thought process behind those choices isn't monitored in any way.
Writers can read their colleagues' screenplays if they want to, or just vote
based on the finished product.
But I do know that at the end of the year, when
studios and publicists are sending screener DVDs to critics and Academy members
for awards-season consideration, they frequently send out screenplays as well.
I know, because I've received a few myself—and I only get about a third
of what a real Academy member would get.
Boys' Club
I was wondering, what are the
demographics of your readership? Specifically, how many men vs. women are
there? I'm a chick and I like it, but I sometimes get the feeling that I might
be in a distinct minority; namely, every time you interview some indie chick
and there's a 150-count comment thread centering on whether she's bangable. (To
the point where the interviews with Summer Glau and Parker Posey have 150-count
threads filled with meta-comments about how the whole discussion of the article
is bound to focus on whether they're bangable. Which it then, by and large,
does.) The Earth is round, guys like to bang hot chicks; I'm not trying to
suggest that I think there's something that one could or ought to do about
that. And such conversations are clearly the minority of what gets discussed at
the site overall. But personally, I tend to avoid those threads, even if I am
interested in the artist, and I'm wondering if there's a lot of chicks like me
who read but don't comment as much, or if the readership is indeed largely
male.
I don't actually know if you can
answer this; the info might be proprietary.
C.
Tasha Robinson is sometimes proprietary:
The info you're looking for isn't that private, C.
In fact, our demographics are readily
available online, as part of the media kit we make available to
potential advertisers. As you can see, our latest numbers (they're updated
twice a year) show a 64/36 male-to-female split, so while you're in the
minority, you aren't one lone voice among thousands of slobbering dudes,
however much it might sometimes seem like it. (I'm right there with you.)
However, it's worth noting that the
demographics are for The Onion as a website as a whole, and aren't
split out by news section vs. A.V. Club. So it's possible that The
A.V. Club skews more male or more female than we realize. It's pretty hard
to tell. (Aren't half the people who claim to be female online just trolling
guys anyway?) Really, the question isn't who's reading, it's who's commenting.
And just judging from the way the comments often go, I tend to think that
commentators as a whole are probably younger, and more likely male, than the
statistical-median Onion reader. Either that, or they're hot lesbians who
also want to get it on with Parker Posey and Summer Glau. Enjoy that image,
predominately young male commentators.
STUMPED NO MORE!
We seem to be four for five this week, alas. Anil was
looking for "some strange children's movie or TV show where a kid winds up in
some strange land and at one point has to cross over a river of eyeballs."
There were a couple of vague theories, but no one was able to identify it
positively. Last chance, armchair experts…
Of the other four, Jalal was looking for an animated short "about a
man who goes to sleep and dreams up a civilization. The dream civilization
becomes so advanced that it realizes they are just a figment of this man's
imagination." Several people identified this as a 23-minute short called
"Rarg!" Special thanks go out to "riblits" for this link to a page with a detailed
description and screenshots, and to saburai for finding
a copy online.
Park remembered a
science-fiction book about a young man living in a world where "anyone who
tested as being too lucky was spirited away and executed." "Real genius" was the
first to identify this as Starluck, by Donald Wismer. It's
out of print, but according
to this page, at least, Wismer might still be selling signed copies
himself. Good luck.
Ronnie was looking for an animated film in
which "a
group of kids have a friend who's dying of an illness. Toward the end, an evil
man propositions them with a choice: sacrifice their own lives by drastically
increasing their ages to save their friend." The general consensus, led by "Daecrist," seems to be that this is the
animated adaptation of The Halloween Tree by
perennial Ask The A.V. Club favorite Ray Bradbury, and also that Ronnie got a
lot of the details wrong. Fortunately, the movie's out there on VHS for those
who want to clarify.
And in a similar vein, Doug's TV show
about a man who loses his skeleton is apparently an episode of Ray
Bradbury Theater (thanks for the link, "Dr. Crippen"), based on
Bradbury's story "Skeleton," from his collection The October Country. The A.V.
Club is seriously considering requiring everyone who sends in a
"please identify this memory" question from now on to first read the collected
works of Bradbury, and then go watch Unico. Maybe if they do, they'll
find that river of eyeballs. Meanwhile, thanks tremendously to everyone who
wrote in with answers.
Next week: Career advice, that
storyteller thing we promised last week, and more. Send your questions to
[email protected].
