Eddington breaks COVID cinema out of quarantine

Ari Aster lets loose the panicky, cringe-inducing frenzy of 2020 and beyond.

Eddington breaks COVID cinema out of quarantine
Introducing Endless Mode: A New Games & Anime Site from Paste

When asked about his latest film, Eddington, director Ari Aster told The A.V. Club, “It’s about a data center being built just outside of a small town.” That’s technically true in the same way that Nashville is about a concert, but Aster’s ambitious, nightmarish, Western-inflected dark comedy about a small town’s reaction to the COVID pandemic is tackling far more than one minor plot conflict. The genre-smashing period piece is one of the first major releases to tackle the traumatic universal experience of the 2020 lockdown and all it inspired. Through the eyes of the modern king of anxiety cinema, COVID merely served as the spark that ignited a discomfiting, dangerous, and cringe-inducing frenzy that redefined the future we now live in. Eddington isn’t the first film to dissect or confront the pandemic but it is, so far, the biggest and brashest.

Aster creates a dense, aggravating, and multi-tentacled analysis of not simply the coronavirus era but the rot that took over every aspect of our lives. In a small town where not much seems to happen, local sheriff Joe Cross (Joaquin Phoenix) just wants to do his job. Most of his work is centered on minor irritants, including a “homelessness problem” which is just one guy (Clifton Collins Jr.). At home, his fragile wife (Emma Stone) fills her hours making ugly dolls while her mother (Deirdre O’Connell) has fallen down a conspiratorial rabbit hole. After a minor incident involving an unmasked local makes Joe a folk hero to some, he decides to run for Mayor against Ted Garcia (Pedro Pascal), a charming centrist who often says the right things but reeks of calculated insincerity. Ted wants to build that environmentally disastrous data center, promising an influx of jobs but concealing the water shortages it will create. That Ted briefly had a romance with Joe’s wife might also be influencing Joe’s decision to become a right-wing anti-mask firebrand. Cue an electoral battle, social media activism, cult leaders, Katy Perry, and more than a few guns. 

It’s not subtle, but what about the last five years has been?

Filmmaking is a long and laborious process, one that makes it less than ideal for up-to-the-minute creative responses to current events. As the lockdown led to a mass shutdown of every industry, the entertainment world followed suit but remained faithful to a stirring ethos: the show must go on. Talk show hosts conducted interviews over Zoom. Actors did John Lennon karaoke. When the first round of loosening restrictions offered a spurt of freedom for creators and CEOs alike, they went back to work but couldn’t ignore that which we were all living with. 

Schlocky COVID zombie movies were churned out with ruthless efficiency, while other projects attempted to use the lockdown’s limitations (and captive movie stars) to their benefit. Doug Liman’s Locked Down was written, filmed, and released entirely during the pandemic, offering a fizzy escapist tale of diamond heists and bantering hot people in the midst of a closed-off world. Coastal Elites offered a passionate plea for a changed world via a slew of stilted monologues. Even Father Of The Bride Part 3(ish), a quickly made short featuring the reunited cast of the enduring family comedy, sought to provide a comforting perspective on self-isolation and familial separation through nostalgic pandering. Such projects were united by their confined productions and a rah-rah sense of succeeding against the odds: Not even COVID can stop Hollywood!

But there’s little pleasure to be mined from a pandemic that killed over seven million people and continues to this day, even if most now choose to ignore it. No matter filmmakers’ genre or angle when addressing the subject matter, there are few inspirational moments to be found in nursing homes full of dead residents or in the collective distress of watching the virus spread. Any humor found was bone-dry and pitch-black.

The latter manifested in Theda Hammel’s acerbic debut Stress Positions. Set during quarantine, the film showed the residents of one bubble driving one another insane. Several narrators share their perspectives on the situation, while Hammel uses tight close-ups and blurred focus to evoke the increasingly hallucinogenic feeling of being stuck inside with the same people day after day. These social confines expose their privilege and festering self-hatred, not unlike that afflicting Eddington‘s teen activists, whose eagerness to latch onto the Black Lives Matter movement—despite a painful lack of knowledge on the issues—devolves into a series of cringe-inducing social media protests. (A James Baldwin comment makes for one of the most scathing jokes on self-satisfied white liberalism committed to film this decade.) Hammel’s vision of lockdown is one where an opportunity to self-reflect revealed itself as a mental and cultural trap. It’s both painful and painfully funny, perhaps the first truly relatable movie about COVID, albeit one where the drama is, by design, self-contained. In Eddington, it runs rampant. It’s not just a couple, or a friend group, or even a mere town that succumbs to the pandemic and the ensuing brain rot. It’s everywhere.

Steven Soderbergh, ever a director fascinated by the fleeting moments that a slow-moving industry tends to forget about, was another filmmaker confining his characters during this time, turning COVID into the backdrop for the thriller Kimi. A hyper-modern take on Rear Window, the title refers to a smart speaker which tracks its users like Amazon’s Alexa while underpaid employees monitor the incoming data. One such employee, agoraphobic programmer Angela (Zoë Kravitz), hears something sinister during one of these sessions. Angela’s mental health, already depleted by her phobia and the lockdown, is shredded to pieces in a world both limited by COVID and surveilled by corporations. Kimi could work in any modern setting, since the omnipresence of spyware and algorithms is now our everyday existence, but Soderbergh savvily understands how being at home with not much to do exacerbated our attachments to the online world. It echoes Eddington‘s doomscrolling age, where every creep with a camera can become a preacher and well-meaning liberal teens dance at anti-racist protests. Both films show an addiction in practice, the trap of the perennially online. COVID is somewhat incidental to Kimi, a film more focused on tech monopolies’ abuse of our civil liberties. Lockdown was the Trojan horse for Soderbergh’s takedown, while it was the catalyst for Aster’s.

Inevitably, the easy route of horror became a popular genre for COVID cinema. Released a mere nine months after lockdown began, Songbird showed the terrifying future of 2024, where COVID-23 had led to a fascist police state and concentration camps. The insight that crises are frequently hijacked to further hard-right political agendas would’ve landed better had the film not been so transparently exploitative, turning ongoing mass deaths into entertainment. With a bit more tact than Songbird, Sick used lockdown as a fitting backdrop for a slasher flick with a morality play twist regarding personal culpability. In The Earth did not specify its pandemic setting, but the surreal folk horror’s agonizing take on paranoia and isolation certainly evoked it. Eddington itself—while a bit more tasteful than Songbird—is not unlike a classic folk horror in the mold of The Wicker Man, claustrophobic while capturing a scenic expanse its characters seem unable to escape from. 

More thoughtfully than the horror films looking to make a quick buck off a trend, Jia Zhangke had spent over 20 years filming documentary-style footage for Caught By The Tides, a meditation on loneliness starring his wife and muse Zhao Tao. During lockdown, he combed through the footage (over a thousand hours) to compile the first two sections, then shot a final chapter set in the COVID-afflicted present. Qiao Qiao, the protagonist, has a tempestuous relationship with a music promoter who falls in and out of her life over the years and inspires a chase through time and across China. Lockdown is but one example of momentous country-wide change in the country, alongside the 2008 Beijing Olympics and the controversial installation of the Three Gorges Dam. For Jia, the lockdown is but one of many anthropological fascinations worth inclusion in his work—Eddington with way fewer manic breakdowns. Both films are state-of-the-nation pieces that seek to interrogate grand societal change in their respective homelands. Both are scathing in their own ways, although Aster’s vision is one with a more grotesque flair. If Jia is meditative, Aster is frantic: Caught By The Tides sees COVID as one of many bumps in the road, but for Eddington, it’s the rabbit hole we may never escape from.

Before Aster recounted this political splintering, there was Radu Jude’s Bad Luck Banging Or Loony Porn, a scrappy and frenetic black comedy from Romania wherein a high school teacher is put on a parent-mandated trial after her sex tape is leaked. The pandemic has only heightened the country’s simmering social issues, and these frenzied parents find comfort in having an easy victim as their punching bag. She’s certainly more simple to confront than their changing world, pushed apart by a widening political gap. Jude, brazenly and fittingly, ends the movie with a much-needed narrative middle finger, both to the hypocritical parents and to a lockdown-stifled audience in need of catharsis. 

But the person who came closest to capturing the totality of pandemic-driven mania pre-Eddington did so outside of film. Bo Burnham’s comedy musical breakdown Inside never mentions COVID by name, but it doesn’t need to. Burnham thoroughly captures the increasing surrealness of a life forcibly lived alone, unmoored and without clarity. His work frequently deals with his uncomfortable relationship with his own fame, and in Inside, he blurs the lines between “real” and “performance” until they’re barely distinguishable from one another. Burnham is not unlike an Aster protagonist: a cog stuck in a twisted machine. The difference is that Burnham, unlike Beau Wassermann, knows he’s in it. Lockdown made us all think about ourselves too much; Inside is unfettered ego death. 

As time marched on, films began showing COVID as what it had become: a mundane part of life, one where masks were used by everyone, and you could instinctively stay six feet away from every person. These signifiers became as much the stuff of historical reenactments as cravats and carriages. Hong Sang-soo’s most recent works, like The Novelist’s Film, feature characters in face masks (or carrying them around their wrists) and carefully keeping their distance from one another. It’s just one more thing to casually mention before getting on with life. What else could it be for so many of us, especially as anti-mask laws have come into force in many places, and vaccine denialism is in rule in the White House? Turning an ongoing pandemic into part of the furniture, even in our movies, is as easy as turning on the lights (although not as easy as ignoring it altogether).

With Eddington, COVID cinema reaches an all-encompassing state. While these other films preceded it and touched on elements of its scope, Eddington is the first movie to stretch its ambitions across the full spectrum of the era’s events, from anti-mask protests and QAnon conspiracies to social justice appropriated by neoliberal smarm and political malpractice. Ted Garcia’s political ads are full of him eagerly fist-bumping Black people despite representing a town with tellingly little diversity. He’s clearly less inept than Joe, but his naked, Gavin Newsom-esque ambition evokes the ineffectual bipartisan leadership that so smothered the nation during lockdown. 

Aster wants the world to remember that which it seeks to forget. For all of the more out-there moments in this story, it’s hard to claim that there’s anything here that doesn’t feel truthful to that bubble of the summer of 2020, or the ravaged world of tinfoil hats and insurrectionists it birthed. Eddington is a cruel film, something that most of its COVID cinema predecessors avoided, but there’s honesty to its cruelty. 

Aster’s prior work found success by exploring a commonly shared nightmare scenario: What if you were set up to fail from the very beginning of your life? In Hereditary, a shattered family realizes it was borne solely to facilitate a callous matriarch’s demonic worship. Midsommar revealed the curious ambivalence of a community whose foundations are rooted in bloodshed. The poor beleaguered Beau of Beau Is Afraid suffers from panic attacks that lead him to believe the world is out to get him—and it is. In Eddington, Aster’s focus goes wider, his worldview less predestined. Nothing about the ways that COVID changed us were necessarily inevitable, but the excuse to act out and hurt others was too good an opportunity to waste. The true labor of community-building proves less satisfying to Eddington’s residents than pettiness, political grandstanding, and doom-scrolling (the terrifying allure of algorithmic content, designed to addict, is acutely conveyed here). 

In her excellent book Doppelganger: A Trip Into The Mirror World, Naomi Klein writes about how conspiracy theorists are energized by a desperate search for answers to things that seem insurmountably terrible, and how all too often the solutions offered are fearmongering fantasies that create a mirror world. It becomes easy to mistake lies for reality when they offer clarity to confusion, even if the answers are as ludicrous as claiming that there are Bill Gates-mandated microchips in the COVID vaccines. For the first time, Eddington depicts that mirror world on the big screen: surreally familiar, steeped in paranoia, perennially online to the point of town-wide brain rot. Everything and everyone is screaming for attention at the same time and it devolves into an exhausting, violent group therapy session.

Aster makes a bold and direct declaration that COVID has irrevocably broken us in ways both damning and dumb as hell. We’d rather unleash the apocalypse than go to therapy (or keep wearing masks). Maybe cinema can provide us with some clarity on the matter, but as Eddington proves, there is nothing cohesive or narratively sensible about a pandemic. That might be what puts off some filmmakers—and most studios—from investing in movies that tackle the subject matter. There are no triumphant endings or teachable lessons the masses took to heart. These films will need to be furious, akin to the works made by queer filmmakers during the AIDS crisis: cries for justice against a crooked system.

It will still take many years for COVID cinema to evolve into something cohesive. After that, perhaps we’ll even get a tasteless inspirational biopic about the era, with swelling violins on the score and a grand Oscar-bait monologue at the climax. But for now, as Ari Aster knows, we’re still stuck in the middle of an edgelord shitpost.

 
Join the discussion...