Eddington breaks COVID cinema out of quarantine
Ari Aster lets loose the panicky, cringe-inducing frenzy of 2020 and beyond.
Photo: A24
When asked about his latest film, Eddington, director Ari Aster told The A.V. Club, “It’s about a data center being built just outside of a small town.” That’s technically true in the same way that Nashville is about a concert, but Aster’s ambitious, nightmarish, Western-inflected dark comedy about a small town’s reaction to the COVID pandemic is tackling far more than one minor plot conflict. The genre-smashing period piece is one of the first major releases to tackle the traumatic universal experience of the 2020 lockdown and all it inspired. Through the eyes of the modern king of anxiety cinema, COVID merely served as the spark that ignited a discomfiting, dangerous, and cringe-inducing frenzy that redefined the future we now live in. Eddington isn’t the first film to dissect or confront the pandemic but it is, so far, the biggest and brashest.
Aster creates a dense, aggravating, and multi-tentacled analysis of not simply the coronavirus era but the rot that took over every aspect of our lives. In a small town where not much seems to happen, local sheriff Joe Cross (Joaquin Phoenix) just wants to do his job. Most of his work is centered on minor irritants, including a “homelessness problem” which is just one guy (Clifton Collins Jr.). At home, his fragile wife (Emma Stone) fills her hours making ugly dolls while her mother (Deirdre O’Connell) has fallen down a conspiratorial rabbit hole. After a minor incident involving an unmasked local makes Joe a folk hero to some, he decides to run for Mayor against Ted Garcia (Pedro Pascal), a charming centrist who often says the right things but reeks of calculated insincerity. Ted wants to build that environmentally disastrous data center, promising an influx of jobs but concealing the water shortages it will create. That Ted briefly had a romance with Joe’s wife might also be influencing Joe’s decision to become a right-wing anti-mask firebrand. Cue an electoral battle, social media activism, cult leaders, Katy Perry, and more than a few guns.
It’s not subtle, but what about the last five years has been?
Filmmaking is a long and laborious process, one that makes it less than ideal for up-to-the-minute creative responses to current events. As the lockdown led to a mass shutdown of every industry, the entertainment world followed suit but remained faithful to a stirring ethos: the show must go on. Talk show hosts conducted interviews over Zoom. Actors did John Lennon karaoke. When the first round of loosening restrictions offered a spurt of freedom for creators and CEOs alike, they went back to work but couldn’t ignore that which we were all living with.
Schlocky COVID zombie movies were churned out with ruthless efficiency, while other projects attempted to use the lockdown’s limitations (and captive movie stars) to their benefit. Doug Liman’s Locked Down was written, filmed, and released entirely during the pandemic, offering a fizzy escapist tale of diamond heists and bantering hot people in the midst of a closed-off world. Coastal Elites offered a passionate plea for a changed world via a slew of stilted monologues. Even Father Of The Bride Part 3(ish), a quickly made short featuring the reunited cast of the enduring family comedy, sought to provide a comforting perspective on self-isolation and familial separation through nostalgic pandering. Such projects were united by their confined productions and a rah-rah sense of succeeding against the odds: Not even COVID can stop Hollywood!
But there’s little pleasure to be mined from a pandemic that killed over seven million people and continues to this day, even if most now choose to ignore it. No matter filmmakers’ genre or angle when addressing the subject matter, there are few inspirational moments to be found in nursing homes full of dead residents or in the collective distress of watching the virus spread. Any humor found was bone-dry and pitch-black.
The latter manifested in Theda Hammel’s acerbic debut Stress Positions. Set during quarantine, the film showed the residents of one bubble driving one another insane. Several narrators share their perspectives on the situation, while Hammel uses tight close-ups and blurred focus to evoke the increasingly hallucinogenic feeling of being stuck inside with the same people day after day. These social confines expose their privilege and festering self-hatred, not unlike that afflicting Eddington‘s teen activists, whose eagerness to latch onto the Black Lives Matter movement—despite a painful lack of knowledge on the issues—devolves into a series of cringe-inducing social media protests. (A James Baldwin comment makes for one of the most scathing jokes on self-satisfied white liberalism committed to film this decade.) Hammel’s vision of lockdown is one where an opportunity to self-reflect revealed itself as a mental and cultural trap. It’s both painful and painfully funny, perhaps the first truly relatable movie about COVID, albeit one where the drama is, by design, self-contained. In Eddington, it runs rampant. It’s not just a couple, or a friend group, or even a mere town that succumbs to the pandemic and the ensuing brain rot. It’s everywhere.
Steven Soderbergh, ever a director fascinated by the fleeting moments that a slow-moving industry tends to forget about, was another filmmaker confining his characters during this time, turning COVID into the backdrop for the thriller Kimi. A hyper-modern take on Rear Window, the title refers to a smart speaker which tracks its users like Amazon’s Alexa while underpaid employees monitor the incoming data. One such employee, agoraphobic programmer Angela (Zoë Kravitz), hears something sinister during one of these sessions. Angela’s mental health, already depleted by her phobia and the lockdown, is shredded to pieces in a world both limited by COVID and surveilled by corporations. Kimi could work in any modern setting, since the omnipresence of spyware and algorithms is now our everyday existence, but Soderbergh savvily understands how being at home with not much to do exacerbated our attachments to the online world. It echoes Eddington‘s doomscrolling age, where every creep with a camera can become a preacher and well-meaning liberal teens dance at anti-racist protests. Both films show an addiction in practice, the trap of the perennially online. COVID is somewhat incidental to Kimi, a film more focused on tech monopolies’ abuse of our civil liberties. Lockdown was the Trojan horse for Soderbergh’s takedown, while it was the catalyst for Aster’s.
Inevitably, the easy route of horror became a popular genre for COVID cinema. Released a mere nine months after lockdown began, Songbird showed the terrifying future of 2024, where COVID-23 had led to a fascist police state and concentration camps. The insight that crises are frequently hijacked to further hard-right political agendas would’ve landed better had the film not been so transparently exploitative, turning ongoing mass deaths into entertainment. With a bit more tact than Songbird, Sick used lockdown as a fitting backdrop for a slasher flick with a morality play twist regarding personal culpability. In The Earth did not specify its pandemic setting, but the surreal folk horror’s agonizing take on paranoia and isolation certainly evoked it. Eddington itself—while a bit more tasteful than Songbird—is not unlike a classic folk horror in the mold of The Wicker Man, claustrophobic while capturing a scenic expanse its characters seem unable to escape from.