Read This: IMDB’s rating system is “completely and irrevocably rigged”

Regular users of the Internet Movie Database, a group that includes virtually everyone with online access and even a passing interest in film, are advised to brace themselves for a shocking revelation: Christopher Nolan might not be the single greatest filmmaker in the history of the medium. Furthermore, Frank Darabont’s The Shawshank Redemption might not actually be the finest film ever made, at least not in any empirically provable way. These are among the assertions made by writer Jonny Coleman in a new article for Mel called “Can IMDB’s Ranking System Be Trusted?” According to Coleman, the site’s famous 10-star rating system is “completely and irrevocably rigged,” despite its outward appearance of fairness and democracy. Though the cagey, inscrutable IMDB plays things close to the vest when discussing the algorithms behind its famed Top 250, Coleman asserts that the site’s math leans too heavily toward “bros,” i.e., young men between 18 and 29 who have plenty of free time to cast their votes for particular movies.