B+

Devil In Disguise: John Wayne Gacy is a refreshing take on the serial-killer drama

Peacock's show, while stylish, resists the urge to glorify its monster.

Devil In Disguise: John Wayne Gacy is a refreshing take on the serial-killer drama

On streamers, serial killers are always hot commodities. Of the top 20 docs on Netflix in 2024, 15 were true crime; Ryan Murphy turned Jeffrey Dahmer and the Menendez brothers into juggernauts (and didn’t stop there); and Mindhunter had Redditors out-psychologizing the FBI. The danger in these re-enactments and dramatizations is obvious: Presenting sympathetic killers and violence as prestige TV stylizes the worst of humanity, retraumatizes families, and glamorizes these acts. 

With that in mind, Peacock’s Devil In Disguise: John Wayne Gacy is a refreshing take on the genre. The eight-episode dramatization begins with the disappearance of his final victim in the 1970s and follows the 10-day police investigation that ensued and led to his arrest. From there, the show travels back and forth in time to offer snippets of Gacy’s life, crimes, and his eventual death by lethal injection in 1994. 

The first episode spends a lot of time with the seemingly jovial murderer, positioning Devil In Disguise as a similar “inside the mind of a killer” series. Yet it’s never really told from Gacy’s point of view, and once the show gets going, it strips Gacy’s power by ignoring him and focusing instead on the wreckage he caused.

The choice to cast Michael Chernus as Gacy is the series’ biggest strength. This isn’t a magnetic antihero with a Hannibal Lecter twinkle, nor is he a misunderstood genius. He’s sweaty, unsettling, and unlikable, even when he’s putting on his good-samaritan routine. That choice grounds the character in a way that’s counterintuitive to the “Netflixification” of serial killers. There’s no easy hook, seduction, nor romanticizing here. Gacy is ordinary, and that’s why he’s extraordinarily terrifying. 

Devil In Disguise hails from Dr. Death showrunner Patrick Macmanus, who has walked this line before. Both seasons of Dr. Death (anthology dramatizations of surgeons Christopher Duntsch and Paolo Macchiarini) were less about those docs’ pathology than the systems that enabled them. Devil In Disguise takes a similar track. Gacy’s crimes anchor the story, but the real tension comes from the investigation, the defeated parents who couldn’t get cops in Chicago to listen, and the communities that rationalized suspicious disappearances as troubled runaways. If Dr. Death was a story about institutional failure, Devil In Disguise is about collective responsibility and what happens when everyone looks away until it’s too late.

Visually, this is still a drama that pulls you in with atmosphere. There are rain-slicked streets, brooding detectives, and lighting that creates noir vibes. But the series resists the most important visual impulses in crucial ways. It never depicts the murders. Gacy rarely interacts with his victims onscreen. And while his famous clown persona is addressed, he never wears a costume. 

Instead, the show spends time with some of these young men and boys, presenting them as full people. To drive the horror home, cameras cut to body bags, grieving parents, and photos. Each episode closes with a tribute to the victims, a structural choice that centers them in the story, not the man who destroyed them and their families. 

The supporting performances amplify that focus. Gabriel Luna brings raw urgency to Rafael Tovar, the investigator desperate to nail Gacy before more boys disappear. Chris Sullivan lends weary determination to prosecutor Bill Kunkle, while Michael Angarano’s Sam Amirante, Gacy’s reluctant lawyer, frames the legal system’s discomfort with defending the indefensible. Marin Ireland bookends the series with aching devastation as Elizabeth Piest, the mother of Gacy’s final victim, Robert. Their arcs underscore how Gacy’s crimes rippled outward, damaging anyone unlucky enough to orbit him.

The series also resists easy psychology. Was Gacy insane? Calculated? A hybrid of both? The show circles these questions but never answers them, refusing the neat closure of many true-crime dramas. Even the trial is minimized. When Gacy is onscreen, it’s usually through someone else’s perspective. That choice reinforces the series’ central argument: The damage matters more than the diagnosis.

That doesn’t mean the series is flawless. The middle episodes sag as the investigation slows, and the timeline jumps can be hard to follow. Some scenes are difficult to watch—not because of gore or pointless sensationalism, but because the emotions surrounding them are so raw. Add in the thematic sprawl—police negligence, systemic homophobia, questions of insanity—and there are unresolved threads throughout. But perhaps that’s also the point. “Maybe some wounds aren’t meant to heal,” one character predicts towards the end of the series.

What makes Devil work is intent. Where Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story drew backlash for retraumatizing survivors while chasing Netflix numbers, Devil In Disguise chooses dignity over shock value. Where Mindhunter invited fascination with the “brilliance” of killers, this series shows the human cost. Where Dr. Death highlighted bureaucratic rot, Disguise expands the indictment outward: Killers thrive not only because they are cunning, but because communities, systems, and sometimes entire cultures let them. 

Devil In Disguise doesn’t crack the crime-drama format wide open, but it does chart a path that feels more responsible. It respects victims. It explores the systemic changes Gacy forced as a result of his crimes. And it never mistakes horror for spectacle. Ultimately, the show is less about one man’s monstrosity than the silence that fostered it. In a television landscape that keeps packaging murder as entertainment, that refusal to glorify may be the boldest choice of all.  

Devil In Disguise: John Wayne Gacy premieres October 16 on Peacock  

 
Join the discussion...