Volume 29 (November 2008)

- “So What,” Pink
- “Hot N Cold,” Katy Perry
- “When I Grow Up,” Pussycat Dolls
- “Disturbia,” Rihanna
- “Closer,” Ne-Yo
- “Forever,” Chris Brown
- “Dangerous,” Karidnal Offishall featuring Akon
- “Whatever You Like,” T.I.
- “Got Money,” Lil Wayne featuring T-Pain
- “Swing,” Savage featuring Soulja Boy Tell ’Em
- “Put On,” Young Jeezy featuring Kanye West
- “The Business,” Yung Berg featuring Casha
- “One Step At a Time,” Jordin Sparks
- “Better In Time,” Leona Lewis
- “Thunder,” Boys Like Girls
- “Addicted,” Saving Abel
- “What About Now,” Daughtry
- “Come On Get Higher,” Matt Nathanson
- “Don’t Think I Don’t Think About It,” Darius Rucker
- “I Still Miss You,” Keith Anderson
In early 2010, A.V. Club writer Nathan Rabin decided to listen to and write about the bestselling, zeitgeist-friendly CD series NOW That’s What I Call Music! in chronological order. Each one of the 38 American NOW! collections compiles a cross-section of recent hits from across the musical spectrum. Beginning with the first entry from 1998, this column will examine what the series says about the evolution and de-evolution of pop music.
The concept of a “guilty pleasure” is rooted in our nation’s eternal push-pull between prurience and Puritanism. What’s pleasure without guilt? I’m not sure, but guilt without pleasure is commonly known as “Judaism.” The concept of a “guilty pleasure” flatters us because it implies that we have such rarified, refined taste that we have to turn off our big, beautiful brains to enjoy Jersey Shore and Crank 2 and Drive Angry 3-D. If given our druthers, we’d happily while away the hours at a local arthouse theater catching Ozu retrospectives, but hot damn if our debauched culture doesn’t keep throwing shiny little baubles of entertainment our way. “We’re better than that,” we tell ourselves, even if the enjoyment we experience from irresistible trash tells us otherwise.
That’s how I used to feel about Katy Perry. I deluded myself into imagining that I was somehow above her. Oh sure, I liked all her hits and enjoyed gazing lovingly at her magnificent cleavage, but I was fundamentally anti-Perry. I was so anti-Perry that I lost a lot of respect for Russell Brand when he got engaged to her. I don’t know Perry, but she’s so ubiquitous that I feel like I do. I’ve consequently cobbled together my conception of her through soundbites, advertisements, music videos, Proactiv commercials, talk show appearances, performances, and music videos. That’s how we process celebrities: We develop snap judgments based on the skimpiest of evidence; if someone seems like a prick to David Letterman, then it’s filed away in our minds that the celebrity in question is an asshole in lieu of evidence to the contrary. It’s not fair, but it is how our minds tend to operate.
So when I decided that I did not care for Perry, I was responding to her public persona rather than her true self. From a marketing standpoint, Perry’s “Zooey Deschanel as slutty ’80s drag queen” persona is brilliant, but it’s not designed to win much in the way of critical respect. So what if everything about Perry’s persona reeks of cynical calculation, from the lipstick lesbianism and Jill Sobule swagger-jacking of “I Kissed A Girl” to song titles like “Teenage Dream” and “California Gurls”? Who ever said pop stars had to be authentic or sincere? I prefer my pop stars pre-fabricated and achingly insincere.
I used to think I hated Katy Perry until I was forced to admit to myself that I love her songs. That’s all that really matters. Perry fulfills all the requirements of a pop star. She’s hot in a trashy, cleavage-centric way. She performs catchy songs and sleeps with movie stars. She’s so hot she gives Muppets erections, a pop star requirement I wasn’t even aware existed until she fulfilled it. And she does a lot of silent movie star-style mugging with her big doe eyes. I won’t make any claims for her as a serious artist, but she makes damn catchy pop songs. For a good three weeks, I would listen to “California Gurls” every time I needed a quick pick-me-up, which was fairly often. I could claim I only enjoy the song ironically, but that’s just not the case. I genuinely love that song, however ephemeral or silly it might be.
“Hot N Cold” is quintessential Katy Perry, a three-minute-long cotton-candy rush that pairs her heavily Auto-Tuned vocals with waves of cheesy ’80s synths and a monster chorus. In true Perry fashion, it’s naughty in a nice way, a PG-rated version of ’80s sleaze about a man incapable of commitment and a woman tired of putting up with his Hamlet-style indecisiveness. It’s a passive-aggressive kiss-off to a passive-aggressive relationship that can’t last but maddeningly won’t end either. It’s not art, but it is entertainment. Oh Katy, you’re no good for me, but I love you all the same.
A few years back at Sundance, I was traipsing through the Def Jam House Of Hype (traipsing is like walking, only fancier) when I ran into someone who volunteered much too freely that he was Perry’s best friend. He said the new ballad she was about to release (which pops up on the next installment of NOW!) was about to change the way everyone saw her and announce her arrival as a serious artist. It didn’t, but it didn’t have to. The world needs pop stars as much, if not more, than it needs serious artists, and right now Perry fills that role smashingly.
Speaking of pre-fabricated and insincere, the Pussycat Dolls and Pink both turn up with pop songs about being pop stars, though both fall squarely on the “obnoxious” side of the half-adorable, half-obnoxious divide. “So What” is Pink’s take on Beyoncé’s pet theme, “Fuck you, I’m awesome.” In this case, the tool being derided is Pink’s ex-husband, though the couple reconciled not long after “So What” rocketed up the charts. “So What” is all sneering attitude and pseudo-rebellious posturing, but as a defiant anthem for the dumped, it has a certain blunt power.