But what really clinched it for me: the Black Lodge sequences in the second episode, which put the surrealism and horror that will clearly be foregrounded this season into the sharpest relief. The creature that emerges from the glass box in episode one harkens all the way back to Lynch’s first directorial effort, the animated short “Six Figures Getting Sick (Six Times),” and the “evolution of the arm” reminded me of Eraserhead’s mystery baby, giving us the sweet shot of “pure heroin Lynch” Mark Frost promised us before the premiere as well as a callback to Fire Walk With Me: “I am the arm and I sound like this.” That’s what I always liked about Twin Peaks, the juxtaposition of nightmare imagery and self-conscious absurdity, and this new season appears to be giving us heightened versions of both of those. Deputy Andy’s hair is goofier, the reveal of the decapitated dead body is more gruesome, and the network wasn’t allowed to give notes on either of them. Good.

Advertisement

[Katie Rife]


To speak of another uncompromising artist who likes the grotesque, the disturbing, and the idiomatically American and who hasn’t dropped anything this big since 2006: Last month, the quarterly science magazine Nautilus published “The Kekulé Problem,” an essay by Cormac McCarthy in which he voices his thoughts about the relationship between the unconscious and the evolution of language. Perhaps McCarthy comes to mind because of the scenes with what Erik calls “Doppel-Cooper,” who cuts an Anton Chigurh-esque figure in dim lighting. Now, when it comes to “The Kekulé Problem,” one can quibble with some of the observations made by the great, comma-and-apostrophe-averse novelist—or point to the fact that the “problem” of the title, an oft-repeated story about the 19th-century German chemist August Kekulé, is probably apocryphal. But McCarthy is writing as an artist of language, rather than a scientist, about a subject that tends to be near and dear to artists in general, but which I think David Lynch understands better than anyone else who works with a camera. There are two points in “The Kekulé Problem” that have stuck with me and that I think apply here. The first is that, in McCarthy’s words, “the unconscious is a machine for operating an animal.” The second is a series of questions that he poses at the head of the final paragraph: “The unconscious seems to know a great deal. What does it know about itself? Does it know that it’s going to die? What does it think about that? It appears to represent a gathering of talents rather than just one.”

Advertisement

I should say here that I’ve only seen these first two episodes, though some of our colleagues and readers have already seen episodes three and four. But I will say that one of Lynch’s great talents is to take the familiar and banal and make it seem as though it were all moving through a single subconscious. His best film and TV work is authentically dream-like because he understands that dreams are not metaphors and yet still have meaning. They are pointing to something and it is in our nature to try and understand. They talk backwards, in a sense. This idea of the dream as a star witness, knocking on the door of the conscious mind in the middle of the night, is linked to Dale Cooper early in the series’ original series. And Cooper—with his boy scout values, his love of coffee, and his enthusiastic interest in dreams and meditation—is an alter ego for Lynch. I am not trying to offer a solution here. To think of a Lynch work as a puzzle to be solved is to miss the point. But with all of these aging familiar faces and the dichotomy between the freely roaming evil Cooper and the powerless good Cooper, doesn’t it seem like the space of this continuation of the series is that of Cooper’s subconscious? Everything has been pushed to extremes. The second episode features a white horse, which may be just another trick of Lynchian suggestion. But horses are also important in Carl Jung’s theories of the collective unconscious, and a dream involving a white horse figures in Sigmund Freud’s writings on the Oedipus complex. And in that mass unconscious that is American popular culture, horses suggest freedom, but also the death and disappearance of the past—the old West.

Advertisement

There is an air of mortality, but not finality. What we’ve seen so far is as true a work of art for TV as anything. But am I the only one who, after finishing the first two episodes, found himself alternately grateful to Lynch and Mark Frost and kind of worried about Lynch’s health?

[Ignatiy Vishnevetsky]


Ignatiy, I was actually thinking of a similar language-related issue inspired by these episodes. It’s what the antidescriptivist Saul Kripke called the “primal baptism” of naming. For him, a name is a rigid designator, making something the same in all possible worlds. The naming that happens in Lynch’s work is foundational in a sense—an arm, a log—but, as the new episodes reveal, these things can evolve. There’s power in naming something, and Lynch’s work is obsessed with the idea that this power might work in unexpected ways. I’ll need to see more episodes to form a clearer opinion, but the power of naming appeared foundational at times, and in a way more akin to Inland Empire than the network iteration of the series.

Advertisement

Like Katie, I was very weirded out at first by the digital HD look that gave certain scenes the feel of a late-night Cinemax production, though after awhile it became strangely fitting, especially as the series jetted all around the country. (Seeing beloved oddball Patrick Fischler pop up in the Las Vegas scene, to again warn someone to hope they never interact with a certain menacing presence—à la his Mulholland Drive monologue about the man behind the diner—was especially satisfying.) Lynch really does seem to be doing a kind of greatest hits of all his various passions and aesthetic styles from throughout his career, and using the universe of Twin Peaks to anchor them all in one story—which, as a diehard fan, was indeed pure Lynchian heroin.

Advertisement

But what struck me most of all in these first two episodes was just how against the contemporary grain Lynch remains in his pacing. While much contemporary film and television sees increasingly rapid-fire editing, the dialogue tempo between these characters was almost defiantly glacial, notwithstanding a few more evenly measured moments (the jailhouse exchange between William and Phyllis Hastings mentioned above, for one). These are conversations here whose speed makes a Yorgos Lanthimos script sound like Aaron Sorkin. This determinedly patient back-and-forth was always an element of Twin Peaks: Think back to that season-two premiere, where Hank Worden’s doddering hotel waiter endlessly dithers while Dale Cooper lies bleeding out at the foot of his bed. But whereas in the show it was often played for laughs, here it was pure destabilizing mood, emphasizing the way the dreamlike nature of the events unfolding in Lynch and Frost’s sprawling narrative could shift into nightmare at any moment—and well before Lillard’s desperate principal insisted it all had to be. In that way, the languorous rhythm is as much a signpost for viewers, a way of easing us into an almost slow-motion reality through which to absorb these two hours, as it is diegetic reality for these troubled souls.

And during the lengthy stretches of meaningful looks and pauses so pregnant they’re practically ready give birth then and there, it seemed as though Lynch was having a blast. For all his talk about being done making movies, the playground of Twin Peaks comes across like it genuinely delights him, in that it gives him license to roam throughout his subconscious without harness. It’s all the sprawl and play of Inland Empire, tethered to a recognizable world and story that grounds it. This feels like a winning combination, is my general bullet point here, and even the deeply elliptical opening hour had me riveted.

Advertisement

[Alex McLevy]