The West Memphis 3’s Damien Echols weighs in on Making A Murderer
Damien Echols is in a unique position to comment on Netflix’s controversial documentary Making A Murderer, having also spent 18 years in prison for a crime he didn’t commit. As one of the West Memphis Three, Echols was convicted based on a coerced confession and his general demeanor rather than any real evidence. In this essay published exclusively in The A.V. Club, he offers his thoughts on the crime—and wrongful convictions. Echols is the author of two books, Life After Death and Yours For Eternity. He can be found on Twitter and Instagram.
Over the holidays I started receiving tweets, Facebook posts, emails, and media requests for interviews regarding my thoughts about the new Netflix series, Making A Murderer. I don’t watch much TV, and I don’t pay attention to the news, but after learning the details of Steven Avery’s case, I have found myself haunted by the parallels to my own life. With each unfolding scene I had the sickening sense that this story will never end, cast as it is with the same characters acting out the same tired old tricks: corrupt cops, inept or powerless public defenders, judges, and prosecutors pursuing political agendas rather than justice for all concerned.
I was convicted of three counts of capital murder in 1993. Along with the two others who were convicted with me, we became known as the West Memphis Three. After enough evidence had been found to grant us a new hearing that would prove our innocence, the state of Arkansas offered us an insane deal called the Alford plea—as part of it, we could legally claim we were innocent, but the state would maintain our guilt. The deal would prevent us from seeking compensation for the 18 years we spent in prison. I spent those years on death row, 10 of them in isolation.
We took the deal, knowing that even if proven innocent it would take us years to be processed out of the prison system. We were released in 2011. Today all three of us are legally considered felons.