Cult Of Criterion: Altered States
A relatively mild Ken Russell film is also one of the wildest studio wide releases Hollywood's ever gambled on.
Photo: The Criterion Collection
In Cult Of Criterion, The A.V. Club highlights a new release from The Criterion Collection each month, examining the films entering an increasingly accessible film canon.
When I started this column a year ago, I wanted to follow in the footsteps of some of my A.V. Club predecessors who helped highlight smaller, odder films that deserve to be remembered by those dipping their toes into cinephilia. At the same time, the series is an acknowledgement of The Criterion Collection (and its streaming service The Criterion Channel) as a modern establishment, one with the same kind of inviting, taken-with-a-grain-of-salt curation as some of the form’s long-standing guide texts—the Sight & Sound polls or 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die or Roger Ebert’s Great Movies or A Personal Journey With Martin Scorsese Through American Movies—and the same kind of surprising strangeness you might once have found browsing a video store’s shelves, steered solely by vibes. Those films that split the difference between the canonized and the cuckoo are special. One of them, Masahiro Shinoda’s Demon Pond, kicked off Cult Of Criterion last October. Now another, Ken Russell’s Altered States, rings in its anniversary.
At first blush, the British oddball’s first Hollywood film offers a wealth of respectable bonafides. William Hurt plays the lead in his debut role, fresh from the post-Juilliard stage. Paddy Chayefsky, one of the few screenwriters some people actually know by name, adapted his own novel for the script (before taking his name off the project). John Corigliano, who had just won a Guggenheim fellowship, was nominated for an Oscar for his first film score. Warner Bros. put the film out into theaters on Christmas. And yet, thanks to Russell—whose baroque work includes The Devils and The Lair Of The White Worm—it’s all in service of a complete head trip, a seriously unserious turn-of-the-’80s reckoning with the countercultural self-experimentation of psychonauts like John C. Lilly.
This contradiction is echoed in the text of the film: A tenured Harvard psychopathologist’s woo-woo tendencies are brushed off by those who can’t help but acknowledge his brilliance. For every blistering diatribe about truth and God, sometimes in the middle of a sex scene, there is a ridiculously brash image that pierces its academic veneer, like a seven-eyed goat Christ or a trippy tea-time. As the professor finds himself drawn again and again towards hallucinating in a sensory deprivation tank, his mind—and, eventually, body—unravels away from his colleagues and loved ones.