Oscar upset aside, Shakespeare In Love is not empty awards bait

Watch This offers staff recommendations inspired by a new movie coming out that week. This week: Roman Polanski’s Venus In Fur, based on a play about a playwright, has us thinking back on other films about the theater.
Shakespeare In Love (1998)
Because it scored a surprise upset over Saving Private Ryan to grab a Best Picture Oscar, Shakespeare In Love has developed a reputation as the apotheosis of empty, Harvey Weinstein-produced award-mongering—and, as such, a clear enemy of real, hard-hitting cinema. But Oscar trivia should not obscure the movie’s tremendous craft and English-major charm. (Besides, it’s Chocolat that truly represents the Weinstein awards machine at its most detestable.) In concocting a heavily referential and entirely fictional story explaining how a young Will Shakespeare (Joseph Fiennes) met his actress muse Viola De Lesseps (Gwyneth Paltrow) while working on the first production of Romeo And Juliet (working title: Romeo And Ethel, The Pirate’s Daughter), co-writers Marc Norman and Tom Stoppard go after plenty of silly jokes about Hamlet, sonnets, and theatrical clichés. But these moments have a unified thematic purpose: The film’s Shakespeare absorbs phrases and ideas from everything around him, meaning that even the dorkier jokes also attempt, in their fanciful yet sneaky way, to explain the man’s impossible genius.