Pop culture obsessives writing for the pop culture obsessed.
Pop culture obsessives writing for the pop culture obsessed.

The Simpsons: “Homerland”

Illustration for article titled The Simpsons: “Homerland”

Jumping in and reviewing The Simpsons in its unprecedented 25th year is undeniably a little daunting. Apart from trying to fill the shoes of the redoubtable Robert David Sullivan, there are a lot of issues that a new reviewer on this beat has to deal with. Having been a teenager when the show first began (I may not be young), it cannot be understated, and is gradually being forgotten, just how influential The Simpsons was and, and remains, on American comedy, television, and animation (and me). That’s one side—definitely some daunting going on there.

On the other is the fact that, in a universal litany perhaps rivaled only by Saturday Night Live, any mention of the show at this point is met with: "It stinks compared with what it used to be.” Indeed, it’s shocking to me that for younger viewers, that monotonous drone of negativity and condescension is all they’ve ever experienced of The Simpsons in the zeitgeist—it’s like going to a Red Sox game in the '80s and seeing spoiled fans boo because Carl Yastrzemski couldn’t hit like he did when he had those long sideburns.

That being said, the sad truth is that late-season Simpsons deserves much (but by no means all) of that dismissive chatter. Each naysayer likes to point out exactly when the show started to lose it (jump the shark, repeat itself, become stale—you pick your cliché), but the only thing everyone seems to agree on is that it definitely happened—and that they don’t watch it anymore. I have to confess that, prior to my getting this gig—and the resulting back-episode catchup binge that that kicked off—I hadn’t sat down to watch a new installment of The Simpsons in years, something that would have been inconceivable for me for the first dozen years of its history. The Simpsons, for a lot of us, simply petered out as appointment viewing.

Going into season 25, the question is then—what does The Simpsons still have to offer?

Certainly its cast is an astounding asset: Despite the fact that whenever asked about the show Harry Shearer answers like he’s got a gun to his head, the voice talent involved here remains simply astounding. Add to that that everyone involved has a quarter century of insight into these characters, and there’s unprecedented potential for characterization and laughs left.

Also, the show’s world, as embodied in its home base of Springfield, is one of the most evocatively detailed, yet malleable, comic settings in TV history. While sister show Futurama could boast the literally infinite storytelling possibilities of science fiction, The Simpsons’ Springfield, bereft of anything more magical than the occasional Loch Ness Monster, provides the show’s writers with a continually resetting comedic template of boundless variety. It’s an Etch-a-Sketch universe where no one ever ages, where anything is possible, and where things are guaranteed to be right where they are when you need them the next time around—a comedy sandbox whose very boundaries themselves define its potential.


Of course the chief asset of The Simpsons are the Simpsons themselves. At various times in its history showrunners have proclaimed their intentions “to bring the show back to the family” and the refrain makes sense. For all the trips to space, meteor scares, and impenetrable domes, The Simpsons lives and dies with viewers’ connection to Homer, Marge, Lisa, Bart, and Maggie. Even with 25 years’ worth of various character arcs, interpretations, and occasional drift into mischaracterization, the Simpsons themselves still provide a sturdy, if dysfunctional, emotional core that grounds even the most improbable shenanigans in relatable, even heartwarming reality.

Which is good news for season premiere “Homerland,” which continues The Simpsons’ tradition of launching each new season with an attention-grabbing gimmick, but manages to squeeze some genuine heart, and a healthy number of laughs, out of the always-evocative relationship between Lisa and Homer. As you may have guessed from the title, the hook here is a Homeland parody, with Homer returning from an unexpected disappearance (from a convention in sinister Boise) a changed man, and Lisa, ever the lone voice of reason, sussing out that there’s more to her dad’s sudden strange behavior (no pork, no alcohol, a fondness for nuclear plant schematics) than clean living. It’s a stunt, but a relatively well-executed stunt.


One’s tempted to call this “an affectionate parody” but there’s not much actual satire going on. It’s more a series of references to Homeland’s plot points and character traits (mainly that that Carrie isn’t too much with the sanity). The script, credited to Stephanie Gillis, generally lets the premise tail wag the episode dog here, relying on viewers’ familiarity with Homeland to provide comic context. If a viewer has never seen Homeland, Homer’s journey to eco-terrorism might still make as much sense as his usual misadventures, but the specific references (the perky female FBI agent being delusional, sex-crazed, and possessed of a suspiciously avuncular and bearded mentor) might seem a little random. Still, there are some decent gags scattered throughout, some show-specific (Kristen Wiig’s Carrie surrogate threatening Homer with a choice of torture or “incredible sex,” Homer’s refusal to strangle Bart with a monotone “That kind of small-scale violence solves nothing”), and some with their own, delightfully silly logic. I especially enjoyed the reveal of the Carrie, then Saul characters in bed next to Homer and Marge, and then the weird little triple-roll Saul does to get into spooning position. (Everyone want to snuggle up against that Saul beard, right? Just me?) Also, the agent’s confrontation with Bart and Milhouse is the biggest laugh of the episode (Bart: “You guys know I don’t talk to field agents. Get your boss on the phone.” Agent: “We know all about you, Milhouse.” “How did you know my name’s Milhouse?” “I didn’t—until now…”)

But the most satisfying element of the episode is the Homer/Lisa dynamic. On one hand, it makes sense to mirror Homeland’s Brody/Dana relationship, with the suspicious daughter trying to reassert her bond with the father she’s suddenly unable to understand (Lisa’s “Why is the father I always wanted creeping me out?” sums it up perfectly.) But, thanks to the established emotional core of Lisa and Homer’s relationship, and Yeardley Smith’s typically affecting performance, there’s another level to the plot machinations. All the way back in season two’s “Lisa’s Substitute” (still one of the most moving episodes ever), Marge’s angry admonition to Homer, “There's a little girl upstairs who needs you. Her confidence in her father is shaken and no little girl can be happy unless she has faith in her daddy,” still provides the emotional through-line for their connection and, in Smith’s hands here, Lisa’s desire to reach her father’s un-brainwashed side seems as much about trying to re-establish that bond as it is about preventing Homer from detonating a truly dirty stink-bomb in the nuclear plant’s air conditioning system. The resolution, with Lisa realizing that Homer’s acceptance of her pet causes is false, re-establishes the status quo as necessary, but before it happens (via some dastardly beer-baiting by Moe), their momentary kinship is both funny and a little touching. (Lisa: “Dad, I’ve told you these things a million times!” Homer: “Lisa—you’ve told me a thousand things a million times.”)


Because Homer has been brainwashed—by VW busload of hippie-types, inculcating him in the ways of vegetarianism, healthy living, and love for the planet, largely it seems through force-listening of the Grateful Dead. Here’s where the Homeland stuff really fails—given that they effect serious change in Homer (giving up beer and meat must be counted as impressive as getting Homer to stink-bomb a nuclear power plant), at least a cursory examination who who they are seems to be in order. Instead, um, one guy wears a funny hat.

In the end, there are some funny lines, the gimmick doesn’t completely overwhelm the narrative, and things are back in place for the next episode. It’s not the worst omen for a new season of The Simpsons. I'm looking forward to it with guarded optimism and an open mind.


Stray observations:

  • The show begins its 25th season without much fanfare, the only nod being Bart’s chalkboard gag: “25 years and they can’t come up with a new punishment.”
  • The couch gag sees Homer being rejected by the bouncer guarding the Simpson’s sofa, even as he allows the rest of Fox’s animation lineup inside to party with the rest of the family. Apart from Bob’s Burgers, I wanted to scream, “You haven’t earned the right to be on that couch!”
  • Marge’s reaction to the new and improved Homer: “He’s like the husband in a widow’s memory!” Also, “He’s changed. For the better. And men don’t change that way!”
  • Homer’s healthy lifestyle extends to the bedroom as well. Marge: “Oh my, what’s that thing you’re doing?” Homer, seductively: “Moving my body…”
  • Some effective direction on Lisa by Bob Anderson, with the movement and shadows as she spies on Homer heightening the tension.
  • The re-imagined opening, with old instances of Simpsons violence edited into Homerland credits to ominous effect, exemplifies the pitfalls of theme episodes like this—it’s accurate, moderately clever, and not actually very funny.
  • Mr. Burns, on being arrested for the plant’s egregious safety violations: “No prison can hold me. Prisons are still made from mud and wattles, right?”
  • The joke where Homer unexpectedly whips out a snaggletoothed fish to fool Mr. Burns’ facial recognition software wouldn’t have been out of place in any great early episode.
  • Homer, sarcastically: “Yesss, my terrorist masters are always talking about you, Lisa…”