Sydney Pollack found a New Hollywood comfort zone for Robert Redford

Over three decades, an actor's director guided his favorite leading man through an unpredictable filmmaking wilderness.

Sydney Pollack found a New Hollywood comfort zone for Robert Redford

With Together Again, Jesse Hassenger looks at actors and directors who have worked together on at least three films, analyzing the nature of their collaborations.

First, it was a meme signifying a vaguely masculine form of respectful agreement. (Are you picturing it yet?) Then it was a meme within a meme, the day on social media that someone expressed surprise over the identity of the bearded man nodding as a camera slowly zoomed in on him. (It is not, in fact, Zach Galifianakis.) Then, finally, it was an Academy-ready final goodbye to and from one of the most beloved actors of the past half-century of cinema. (We’ll see this spring whether social media has rendered it impossible to use that footage in an actual In Memoriam reel.) But before all of that internet gunk, it was simply a shot of Robert Redford in the wilderness, nodding in approval from about halfway through Jeremiah Johnson, his second movie with Syndey Pollack, his most frequent director. 

Redford’s Hollywood rise coincided with one of the most exciting shifts in 20th-century American filmmaking, as the New Hollywood movement pushed aside the lingering big-studio bloat of the 1960s. Redford reflected this in his later life’s work as the founder of the Sundance Institute and its accompanying independent film festival—named for his character in 1969’s Butch Cassidy And The Sundance Kid, a major work of emerging New Hollywood artistry and a lighter buddy-comedy flipside to Midnight Cowboy, which came out the same year. During the actual 1970s and beyond, though, Redford did not celebrate this artistic revolution by working with Martin Scorsese, Brian De Palma, Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, Robert Altman, Peter Bogdanovich, Hal Ashby, or Francis Ford Coppola (unless you count a couple of Coppola screenplay credits). He did make two more movies with George Roy Hill, director of Butch Cassidy, as well as one with the satirically minded Michael Ritchie. But for most of the ’70s, while the likes of De Niro and Pacino were baring their souls and reinventing movie stardom, Redford was doing Sydney Pollack movies. In the ’80s and ’90s, when his on-camera appearances became scarcer in the wake of his directorial and Sundance obligations, while an even newer wave of exciting American filmmakers ascended, Pollack movies remained a priority. 

This isn’t meant as a knock on Sydney Pollack, mind you. The man made Tootsie; is there a better validation of the journeyman filmmaker than making Tootsie? And, for that matter, Pollack was partially responsible for several of Redford’s best, or at least most memorable film roles. Among those, Jeremiah Johnson—their first really well-known collaboration—may be the most authentically New Hollywood of the bunch. Some might understandably point to Three Days Of The Condor, the 1975 film that did much of the heavy lifting in terms of associating Redford with paranoia thrillers of the period, even though Condor and the reality-based All The President’s Men are his only real entries in that subgenre. (He made more movies updating that model for later eras—Sneakers, Spy Game, The Company You Keep—than he did at the time.) Moreover, Three Days Of The Condor is great entertainment that would play similarly well in any number of decades.

Jeremiah Johnson, though, is a stranger movie by most measures. The basic story could have been a classic Western, following the title character in a journey through the 19th-century wilderness, his eventual formation of an unexpected makeshift family, and a mission for revenge when that family is harmed. But it’s simultaneously not as bold an anti-Western as the previous year’s McCabe And Mrs. Miller and not as straightforward as a genre piece that might have come out two decades earlier. Much of the film features Redford quietly, slowly fumbling his way through a barely explained quest for wilderness isolation. It features several old-timey theme-song-like ballads. Despite being under two hours, it features both an overture and an intermission. This was the fifth-biggest U.S. release of 1972. When I watched it as a teenager, I thought it was boring as shit. 

I was wrong, of course. The many ways that Jeremiah Johnson departs from the charm of Butch Cassidy are features, not bugs. Pollack isn’t deconstructing Western myths so much as observing, with a clear eye, a man living out a lonelier version of them. The film is therefore attentive to Johnson’s hardships without turning them into a visceral endurance test. At the same time, in its semi-austere way, it’s also one of Pollack’s more stylish movies, from stately wide shots capturing figures in vast expanses of mountain snow to some surprisingly slam-bang moments of action to that famous slow zoom. But that stuff was, at least per Pollack himself, secondary to his facility with actors, owing to starting his career as one himself; he actually met Redford when both men appeared in the film War Hunt in 1962. 

Redford’s work in Jeremiah Johnson could be seen as a calculated act of withholding, as he gives a minimalist performance (at least in movie-star terms) that doesn’t risk betraying such a handsome man‘s potential ill-suitedness to playing a grizzled mountain man. But Pollack brings out a key element of the Redford style, far more so than in their first film together as director and actor, the Tennessee Williams adaptation This Property Is Condemned. That film came out in 1966, well before Redford’s movie-star peak—though he had already been paired once with co-star Natalie Wood in the previous year’s Inside Daisy Clover. As a railway man tasked with closing a station in Depression-era Mississippi and a possible beacon of hope for local free spirit Alva (Wood), Redford’s trademark keel plays as opaque, even chilly at times. It’s part of the character, but the withholding only takes him so far; by the end of the movie, his character remains too inscrutable for much emotion to land. (It doesn’t help that the movie’s ending is mystifyingly abrupt despite the film running nearly two hours.) Embracing the low-dialogue desolation of Jeremiah Johnson, though, works wonders for Redford, who no longer seems quite so aloof despite saying even less. He makes every decision seem considered and self-determined. He brings a rare quality to the golden-boy leading man: the impression of thinking. This was not a constant feature of, say, Ryan O’Neal, and it makes Redford surprisingly believable in a variety of roles, from mountain men to CIA nerds. 

Still, Redford and Pollack were still clearly attracted to post-cowboy roles, especially as the decade approached its end. Following the more conventionally entertaining Condor and The Way We Were, Redford and Pollack made another sorta-Western with The Electric Horseman, which arguably set a template for their remaining (and less artistically successful) collaborations. The Electric Horseman specifically feels like it could be a minor-key Clint Eastwood vehicle, and also parallels another Altman anti-Western foray, the little-seen Buffalo Bill And The Indians, Or Sitting Bull’s History Lesson, where Redford’s old partner in crime Paul Newman plays Buffalo Bill as the star of a Wild West show. Redford’s Sonny Steele, a more contemporary rodeo performer, has no such ceremony, even in fakeness; once a champion rider, he opens the movie as a drunkard doing half-assed cowboy stunts to promote a breakfast cereal. (His light-up outfit provides the film’s title.) In a fit of pique over the mistreatment of a champion horse he’s given at a Las Vegas show, he rides the steed straight off stage and out of the venue, embarking on a mission to set the creature free. It also features a bit of It Happened One Night when reporter Hallie Martin (Jane Fonda) winds up going along for the ride.

Redford and Fonda, in their third of four co-starring vehicles, have chemistry, and The Electric Horseman is a minor charmer. It brings Redford back to outdoorsy, quasi-environmental image-making—even if he is playing overtly washed in a way that goes further than usual for his later-period characters, who tend to be slightly diminished rather than hitting bottom—after spending many of his ’70s highlights in more urban settings. It also introduces a lopsidedness to Redford romances, which Pollack came to specialize in after The Way We Were. That movie gives equal weight to the tumultuous partners Hubbell (Redford) and Katie (Barbra Streisand), and largely gives the moral upper hand to Streisand, as Katie practices ideals in politics and disappointment in her WASPy paramour, who prefers an easier, breezier lifestyle. In general, Pollack and Redford’s movies seem to work best when some larger force exerts itself upon the star, whether it’s nature in Jeremiah Johnson, conspiracy in Three Days Of The Condor, or bittersweet romance in The Way We Were

In The Electric Horseman and Out Of Africa, Pollack pairs Redford with a powerhouse actress, just as he did in The Way We Were. But that Eastwoodian sensibility, which very much carries over into the Oscar-winning Out Of Africa, has more than a hint of movie-star vanity, too. Jeremiah Johnson’s rugged individuality holds hints of private anguish or compulsion, amplified by the distance with which he’s sometimes observed. When he returns to the site where he’s just slaughtered several members of the tribe responsible for his makeshift family’s death, he lies down on the ground in sorrow, and Pollack’s camera pulls away, rather than getting in close. It’s a counterintuitive choice for such an actor-friendly director, and it works beautifully. Denys, Redford’s Out Of Africa character, arguably lives with greater moral dubiousness. He’s a quasi-respectful big-game hunter in British-controlled East Africa who eventually gets involved with aristocratic farmer Karen Dinesen (Meryl Streep), and the latter is the movie’s main concern; the film scarcely seems interested in any tension between the character’s love of Africa and his colonialist position, despite 70 years of hindsight. 

Out Of Africa nonetheless won Sydney Pollack a Best Director Oscar, five years after Redford won one for Ordinary People. It’s notable that unlike Eastwood, Redford’s earliest attempts at directing did not include himself as an actor—and when he did finally turn the camera on himself, it resulted in the soft-focus self-mythologizing nightmare of The Horse Whisperer. So maybe Pollack was actually keeping Out Of Africa in check, even if the movie now feels like an awfully long walk through Nairobi. Streep and Redford are good together, and Out Of Africa has an old-fashioned sweep that must have felt a throwback even in its original 1985 release, now 40 years ago. At the same time, that Redford deliberateness isn’t mitigated by the elemental immediacy of Jeremiah Johnson, the urgency of Condor‘s plotting, or the nuanced character dynamics of The Way We Were. The movie’s reputation is propped up by typically detailed work from Streep, some amazing location cinematography, and the fact that it’s not Havana, the final Redford/Pollack film, released five years later.

In Havana, Redford plays a professional gambler in late-’50s Cuba whose apolitical, self-interested stance is challenged by his romantic interest in the wife (Lena Olin) of a revolutionary leader. Sound familiar, as time goes by? Havana‘s blatant modeling on Casablanca keeps it from immediately scanning as another alt-Eastwood vehicle, but it’s somewhere in that vicinity—specifically in its pokiness. A movie with a semi-doomed love story, revolution in the air, and several explosions somehow feels like the characters are mostly waiting around for a card game to start, then vaguely impatient for it to end. Watch the movie, and you’ll know how they feel. Havana has great atmosphere, often gorgeous cinematography that gives Pollack a chance to add some noir shades to his palette, and a punishingly slow pace that eventually resembles a trek through beautifully shot mud. On paper, it’s not wildly different from Out Of Africa; for that matter, Redford’s character in Havana is arguably better-suited to his age and skillset, and less self-flattering. But Lena Olin, through no fault of her own, isn’t exactly Meryl Streep or Jane Fonda, and Pollack’s later-period tendency to keep Redford’s well-judged reticence centerstage backfires. The whole movie feels like it’s thinking, and possibly stalling. 

Havana also muddles its time periods: set in the 1950s, with a plot out of the 1940s, bloated in a way that recalls those last gasps of 1960s big-studio productions, and released in 1990. Sneakers‘ bouncy caper must have felt even more refreshing in 1992 to anyone who had recently sat through this one; it’s a confident merging of early-’90s tech, late-’60s history, and Redford’s ’70s heyday. For that matter, Pollack made at least one decent late-period thriller, too: The Interpreter, 15 years after Havana, maintains an old-fashioned tension the Redford movie lacks. 

Redford, meanwhile, proceeded to star in his share of tedium, like Horse Whisperer and Indecent Proposal. That is to say his taste in romantic dramas bent toward a lacquered, soft-focus, borderline tacky sensibility. For all his appreciation of artistic independence, Redford took comfort in the old-fashioned, perhaps even more than Pollack. Today, their first film together, This Property Is Condemned, plays like a transmission from an alternate universe where Redford became a big star a decade and change earlier, when he might have made a decidedly different set of movies with different co-stars—and maybe would have been left behind by the changes of the ’70s. On Pollack’s side, though, the filmmaking has younger-man energy, as if it’s itching to jump forward a few years when this kind of theatrical melodrama might go a little further in content or style. It’s a movie that feels nothing like Havana, but they bookend the Redford/Pollack partnership by feeling unstuck in time. 

Their ’70s films, on the other hand, feel perfectly timed; even Electric Horseman, which isn’t as good as their other three collaborations from that decade, makes sense as a product of 1979. Jeremiah Johnson, The Way We Were, and Three Days Of The Condor aren’t as galvanizing as the movies Scorsese, Coppola, or Altman were making around the same time. In retrospect, Redford excelled at making ’70s versions of well-worn crowd-pleasing types: the romance, the thriller, the Western. As he grew older, he excelled at playing characters reflecting on their checkered choices. It’s easy to picture several of his later self-directed vehicles, like Lions For Lambs or The Company You Keep, working better with Pollack at the helm. As is, the pair’s last few movies together were more of an awkward transitional phase where they both seemed too in thrall of Redford’s famous persona. But Pollack, that ultimate actor’s director, preserved his favorite leading man through an unpredictable decade, making the most of what could have been a movie-star wilderness.

 
Join the discussion...